OT - Test for lead in lipstick | Arthritis Information

Share
 

From: Dr. Nahid Neman

        Who works in the breast cancer unit at
              Mt. Sinai Hospital , in Toronto .
 
If there is a female you care anything about, Share this with her. I did!!!!! I am also sharing this with the males on my e-mail list,
Because they need to tell the females THEY care about as well! Recently a lipstick brand called "Red Earth" Decreased their prices from
to .90. It contained lead. Lead is a chemical which causes cancer. The lipstick brands that contain lead are: CHRISTIAN DIOR ESTEE LAUDER RED EARTH (Lip Gloss) CHANEL (Lip Conditioner) MARKET AMERICA-MOTNES LIPSTICK. The higher the lead content, The greater the chance of causing cancer. After doing a test on lipsticks, It was found that the Y.S.L. Lipstick
Contained the most amount of lead. Watch out for those lipsticks
Which are supposed to stay longer. If your lipstick stays longer, it is
Because of the higher content of lead. Here is the test you can do yourself: 1. Put some lipstick on your hand. 2. Use a Gold ring to scratch on the lipstick. 3. If the lipstick color changes to black, Then you know the lipstick contains lead. Please send this information to all your girlfriends, Wives and female family members. This information is being circulated at Reed Army Medical Center Dioxin Carcinogens cause cancer, Especially breast cancer watchingwolf2008-03-02 13:29:30http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/lipstick.asp Wow makes me glad i use the cheap stuff. Thanks for the info but i will try the test for the cheap stuff also.Well guess what, I live in an apt complex, that has signs around that state these apts have lead, so lipstick is the least of my worries..

 
and do you know how incredibly HARD .... almost impossilbe it is to find apt places that take SEC 8 and cats...
 
so i really haven't studied much about it.. bc i just don't want to know.. i'm sooo tired, of being told EVERYTHING is bad for me...
 
I will continue w/ my healthy diet, of regular coke (no nutra sweet).. chips.. cookies..
Rofl..
 
appreciate the info, i'm just soo tired and want to sleep and can't.. you know that  weird wacky feeling, you get when knackered..
 
i mean.. i like where I live... and...if i die, ok.. so be it..
but i honestly don't think i'm going to die or get sick from lead..
 
I have RA.. thats enough, to deal w/ lol
 
and really how much lead is too much??... how many generations have lived thru this and been ok?
 
one can only deal w/ so much reality.. LOL..:P sorry.. others will be happy to know..
Whispered - yeah, believe it or not, I'm a little sick of 'reality' too.  Still, if we want to heal, we need to address ALL issues that got us sick.  Quite a lot of AI people have heavy metal toxicity.
 
Pip
 
 
http://www.bargainshare.com/index.php?showtopic=113464

The Worry Over Lead In Lipsticks

This year, millions of kids’ toys were recalled after lead was found in them. Now a new study shows that more than half of the 33 red lipsticks tested from drug and department store brands contained detectable levels of lead, a proven neurotoxin in humans. One-third of them exceeded the Food and Drug Administration’s level for lead in candy. As it turns out, the FDA—which regulates the beauty industry—has no pre-market approval authority over cosmetics and can only ask for a product recall, not demand it. And manufacturers don’t have to file data on ingredients or report injuries. “Nearly 90% of the over 10,000 chemicals used in cosmetics have not been evaluated for safety,” says Stacy Malkan of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, which conducted the study. Critics of the study assert that any trace amounts of lead ingested from red lipsticks would be harmless. To learn which brands are lead-free, click here.
http://www.safecosmetics.org/your_health/poisonkiss.cfm
 
 
 
:: home  :: your health  :: a poison kiss: the problem of lead in lipstick
< id=signUp name=signUp =http://.safecosmetics.org/join/ method=get>
Email : < maxLength=101 size=15 name=email> < = height=37 width=49 ="http://www.safecosmetics.org/virtualApplicationResources/s/safecosmetics/sign_up.jpg" border=0 name=signup>

A Poison Kiss: The Problem of Lead in Lipstick

While you may not be able to test for lead by rubbing a gold ring on your lipstick as some urban legends suggest, laboratory testing initiated by the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics has found that some lipsticks from top brands do contain lead.

Lead is a potent neurotoxin and linked to numerous other health and reproductive problems—and it doesn't belong in lipstick. Following the release of these test results, Senators John Kerry, Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer sent a letter to the FDA demanding action to protect our health.

For more information, visit our press room or download a copy of "A Poison Kiss," our report on lead in lipstick with a complete list of products tested. Then take action by writing a letter to L'Oreal, the brand with the highest lead results in our sample.

Please also read our FAQs specific to lead in lipstick. Still can't find the information you need? E-mail us.

Read the FAQs »
Download report »

 

-----------------------------

http://www.cosmeticdatabase.com/index.php?nothanks=1

-----------------------------

Recent Reports on Chemicals in Cosmetics


Learn More »
Download report »  (PDF)

Skin Deep: A Safety Assessment of Ingredients in Personal Care Products (Web site): The Environmental Working Group's (EWG's) six-month computer investigation into the health and safety assessments on more than 10,000 personal care products found major gaps in the regulatory safety net for these products. Also available is an online rating system that ranks products on their potential health risks and the absence of basic safety evaluations. The core of the analysis compares ingredients in 7,500 personal care products against government, industry, and academic lists of known and suspected chemical health hazards.

Phthalates Linked to Feminization of Boys (Web site)
Concerns about the health impacts of phthalates continue to mount, with new research linking high phthalate levels with feminized genitals in baby boys.  A recent government-funded study by Dr. Shanna Swan, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Rochester, correlated prenatal phthalate exposure with a shortened anogenital distance (AGD) in male babies. The higher the levels of phthalates in the mother during pregnancy, the more likely the researchers were to find the shortened AGD. When this occurred, the boys were more likely to have incomplete testicular descent and smaller penises. The changes occurred at phthalate levels that have been measured in about one quarter of women in the United States.

See the Op-Ed by Dr. Swan in the San Francisco Chronicle » 


Not Too Pretty  (PDF)
Independent laboratory tests found phthalates in more than 70% of health and beauty products tested – including popular brands of shampoo, deodorant, hair mouse, face lotion and every single fragrance tested.

Aggregate Exposures to Phthalates in Humans  (PDF)
This Health Care Without Harm report documents the science on phthalates and shows that people are exposed to phthalates from multiple sources and that those exposures may be adding up to harm. The report shows how no government agency is looking at the big picture of multiple exposures to phthalates.

Pretty Nasty  (PDF)
Documents product tests in Europe that also found phthalates in the majority of products tested.

---------------------------------

Are Your Products Safe?

The chemicals in any one consumer product alone are unlikely to cause harm. But unfortunately, we are repeatedly exposed to industrial chemicals from many different sources on a daily basis, including cosmetics and personal care products.

Many of these chemicals have gotten into our bodies, our breast milk and our children. Some of these chemicals are linked to cancer, birth defects and other health problems that are on the rise in the human population. Some chemicals found in a variety of cosmetics — including phthalates, acrylamide, formaldehyde and ethylene oxide — are listed by EPA and the state of California as carcinogens or reproductive toxins.

Learn more about lead in lipstick »
Learn more about 1,4-Dioxane » 
Learn about the top ingredients of concern » 
View health studies » 
See if your favorite products contain toxic chemicals » 


US Laws Don't Protect Us

Major loopholes in federal law allow the billion cosmetics industry to put unlimited amounts of chemicals into personal care products with no required testing, no monitoring of health effects, and inadequate labeling requirements.

From the FDA website:

"The regulatory requirements governing the sale of cosmetics are not as stringent as those that apply to other FDA-regulated products... Manufacturers may use any ingredient or raw material, except for color additives and a few prohibited substances, to market a product without a government review or approval."

Read more about the FDA's authority over cosmetics »


European Laws Mean Safer Products
The European Union has more stringent and protective laws for cosmetics than the US. The EU amended the Cosmetics Directive (76/768/EEC) in January 2003 to ban the use of chemicals that are known or strongly suspected of causing cancer, mutation or birth defects. This amendment went into force in September 2004. (Visit the European Commission online for the most recently amended Cosmetics Directive in multiple languages.)

The European Union is also proposing to change the way it regulates all chemicals in order to better protect human health. EU wants to require chemical companies to test chemicals for health effects before they are put on the market. The Bush Administration has been working to stop Europe from passing these protective laws. See a report by Rep. Henry Waxman for more information on US interference with the EU plan to change the way chemicals are regulated.


What is the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics doing?
The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics is asking cosmetics companies to sign the Compact for Safe Cosmetics, a pledge to not use toxic chemicals and to make safer, reformulated products readily available in the U.S. and in every market they serve. More than 500 companies have signed the Compact to date. We're also pushing for smarter laws to protect our health from toxic chemicals.

Join us today in our call for safer products and smarter laws! »
Learn more about us »

State Level Efforts for Smarter Laws
Because at this time, federal oversight of the cosmetics industry is virtually non-existent, some states are taking their own action to limit toxic chemicals in cosmetics. 


Copyright ArthritisInsight.com