Risk of Development of Lung Cancer in RA | Arthritis Information

 

Risk of Development of Lung Cancer Is Increased in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Large Case Control Study in US Veterans

RITU KHURANA, ROBERT WOLF, STEVEN BERNEY, GLORIA CALDITO, SAMINA HAYAT, and SETH MARK BERNEY

ABSTRACT.

Objective. To investigate the occurrence of lung cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the US veteran population. Patients with rheumatic diseases appear to have an increased risk for the development of lymphoproliferative and some solid organ malignancies.

Methods. We conducted a retrospective case control study using prospectively collected data from the Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISN) 16 Veteran Affairs (VA) database from 1998 to 2004. We studied the association of RA and lung cancer and analyzed data on 483,721 VA patients. Patients were identified by searching for the diagnoses of RA and lung cancer based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. We identified 8768 (1.81%) patients with a diagnosis of RA (ICD code 714.0), 7280 (1.5%) patients with lung cancer (ICD code 162.0), 247 patients with lung cancer and RA, and 7033 patients with lung cancer but no RA. Logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for age, gender, race, and tobacco and asbestos exposure. Statistical tests were conducted at a 5% level of significance.

Results. The diagnosis of RA was determined to have a significant association with lung cancer in this veteran population. Patients with RA are 43% (odds ratio 1.43) more likely to develop lung cancer than patients without RA, when adjusted for covariates.

Conclusion. Our study shows a significant positive association between RA and the development of lung cancer in the veteran population. Veterans with RA have an increased incidence of lung cancer when compared to the non-RA population. (J Rheumatol First Release July 15 2008)

Key Indexing Terms:

RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
SCREENING MEDICINE
LUNG CANCER
DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY

---

From the Department of Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Medicine, Overton Brooks VA Medical Center; Department of Biometry; and Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA.

R. Khurana, MD, Department of Medicine, Temple University Hospital; R. Wolf, MD, Department of Medicine, Overton Brooks VA Medical Center; S. Berney, MD, Department of Medicine, Temple University Hospital; G. Caldito, PhD, Department of Biometry; S. Hayat, MD; S.M. Berney, MD, Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center.

Address reprint requests to Dr. R. Khurana, Department of Rheumatology, Temple University Hospital, 1316 W. Ontario Street Jones Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19140. E-mail: ritu.khurana@gmail.com

Accepted for publication March 19, 2008.

[QUOTE=Lynn49]

483,721 VA patients.

8768 (1.81%) patients with a diagnosis of RA

7280 (1.5%) patients with lung cancer

247 patients with lung cancer and RA

7033 patients with lung cancer but no RA.

Logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for age, gender, race, and tobacco and asbestos exposure. Statistical tests were conducted at a 5% level of significance.

Patients with RA are 43% (odds ratio 1.43) more likely to develop lung cancer than patients without RA, when adjusted for covariates.

[/QUOTE]

Maybe my Pop Tart has not kicked in yet, but I don't see how those numbers come out to a bad risk?  Slightly more vets overall have RA to begin with.  If there are more people overall with brown eyes, does having brown eyes increase your risk of lung cancer?

But more importantly to me, it doesn't look like a "logistical regression analysis" was performed for medications - just tobacco, etc.
2.8% of the vets with RA have lung cancer while only 1.5% of the vets without RA have lung cancer

Edit to change lunch cancer to lung cancer
JasmineRain2008-07-22 05:43:13Would a "5% level of significance" make that statistically the same?  +/- 5%? [QUOTE=Suzanne]Would a "5% level of significance" make that statistically the same?  +/- 5%? [/QUOTE]

No.  Think about it... out of 1000 vets with RA, 28 get lung cancer.  Out of 1000 people without RA, 15 get lung cancer.  That's more than a 5% difference.
I'm going to have eat another Pop Tart....5% of 1000 people is 50, right?  So a difference of 13 people is not a 5% difference?  I used to be good at math once upon a time, but do not make any claims to that at this point, so  I'll happily accept that I'm wrong LOL.

Regardless, this study does not appear to account for the medications used to treat RA.  Since the numbers don't seem horrible horrible to me, that could be a good thing for the med risk, too.
Suzanne2008-07-22 06:06:15 [QUOTE=Suzanne]I'm going to have eat another Pop Tart....5% of 1000 people is 50, right?  So a difference of 13 people is not a 5% difference?  I used to be good at math once upon a time, but do not make any claims to that at this point, so  I'll happily accept that I'm wrong LOL.

Regardless, this study does not appear to account for the medications used to treat RA.
[/QUOTE]

But the 5% is not of the total, it's of the sick.

Being an ex-smoker, I like this study much better:

Copyright ArthritisInsight.com