Bisphosphonates Tied to High Jaw Necrosis Risk | Arthritis Information

Share
 

The prevalence of osteonecrosis of the jaw appears to be about 1 in 1,700 for adults taking long-term oral bisphosphonate therapy, according to an initial analysis of a group of Kaiser Permanente Northern California members.

Dr. Joan Lo surveyed 13,946 members who'd been taking oral bisphosphonates for at least 1 year and had no known exposure to intravenous bisphosphonate. The researchers received 8,568 responses to the mailed survey, which included questions about dental symptoms, said Dr. Lo, an endocrinologist at the Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society. Respondents who reported a diagnosis of osteonecrosis, or who reported exposed bone, periodontal disease, delayed bone healing, complications after invasive dental procedures, or persistent symptoms of concern were offered a dental exam by dentists on the PROBE study team. Cases of suspected osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ)—defined as exposed bone for greater than 8 weeks in the maxillofacial region, absent prior radiation—were referred for further examination by an oral surgeon. Dental records were reviewed in cases where patients declined a dental exam. Pharmacy records were also reviewed for all patients.

Of those who responded, about 6,402 patients did not have any symptoms of concern. A little more than 2,000 had symptoms of concern; 1,000 of those patients were examined by a dentist.

Dr. Lo said the team had identified eight cases of ONJ so far, for a prevalence of 0.09%, or 1 in 1,100. Three were localized to the palatal torus, and one in the mandible. The remaining four had bone exposure in the mandible following extraction. The confirmed cases had variable areas of bone exposure, variable locations, and various predisposing factors, she said.

In addition, the researchers identified an additional nine patients who had ONJ-like features but did not meet the classic definition of bisphosphonate-related ONJ. Three patients had signs of osteomyelitis of the mandible; an additional four had transient exposure, and another had a small area of bone exposure that persisted up to 1 year but eventually healed after a tooth extraction. The ninth patient had spontaneous tooth loss. Five had evidence of radiographic abnormalities, said Dr. Lo.

With these additional ONJ-like cases, the prevalence increased to 0.2%. Extrapolated to the entire cohort of patients taking bisphosphonates, the prevalence was 1 in 1,729, said Dr. Lo.

The current definition of bisphosphonate-related ONJ may not cover the spectrum of jaw complications seen in patients with long-term exposure, and may underestimate ONJ's prevalence, said Dr. Lo.

Such complications include nonhealing extraction sites and osteomyelitis or osteoporosis without exposed bone. The Kaiser researchers will continue to compile dental records to come up with a more accurate estimate of prevalence, she said.

Dr. Lo disclosed no conflicts of interest related to the study.

When you read this post all the ads are for osteoporosis meds.

I am on one of the IV meds which hopefully will be fine for me.   The side effects are scary but so are broken bones, spine without treatment.

Bird Girrl2008-07-25 07:19:02This tells some of the risks and says it's mostly temporal - the longer on the greater the risk. 
 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18613812?ordinalpos=4&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
 
They inhibit wound healing in the mucosa of the mouth - diabetics need to be aware of this
 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18423269?ordinalpos=32&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
 
There is great risk on BP's for those who due intrvaneous -\
 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18234504?ordinalpos=54&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18167381?ordinalpos=62&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
 
Pip
 
 
I've been on actonel for a yr now, after my dex scan showed I had osteoporosis.  I don't feel I have any choice but to take this drug right now, since I've already had a fractured sacrum which was more painful than any RA pain.
 
Taking actonel is a concern, as I also have sjogren syndrone, very dry mouth, so I'm worried about dental problems, but I see my dentist every 6 months so hopefully will avoid needing  any major dental work.
 
For other RAers out there, be very mindful of having adequate calcium (and vt d) and having a dex scan at an appropriate time for you.  If you have osteopenia, you could avert developing osteoporosis by taking calcium and doing weight bearing exercise, and perhaps not go on a drug like actonel, which "could" present problems later.
 
Joy - if you have dental problems, especially in light of infection being linked to CAD etc, I'd suggest moving to cleaning every 3 months like for those who have periodontal disease.  It may make all the difference in the world.
 
Hugs,
 
Pip
Pip,
 
Thanks for the suggestion.  I have asked my dental hygienist if I should have a cleaning more often than six months, and she said no, but I do see her again in August, so will get an update on how well I'm doing w/my electric toothbrush and ask again if I should come in more often.
 
One suggestion she had for my dry mouth was to chew sugarless gum w/xylitol -- chewing gum generates saliva plus the xylitol, has some anti bacteria properties.  I buy a box of gum at costco to save $$.

Copyright ArthritisInsight.com