NO RA yet | Arthritis Information

Share
 

Hi All,

 
I'm new here and have a few questions. (as most newbies :)) After just a 2 day knee pain that came back on 3 separate occasions I had my blood tested for signs of RA. They couldn't find any inflammation-related signs or RF antibodies, however I had a strongly positive anti-CCP antibody response. This gives me a big chance of developing (severe) RA in the future, is what I've been able to find thusfar. I now have an referral to see a rheumatologist soon.
 
I am mainly wondering: is there any prevention therapy? Will any meds be started just because the anti-CCP is high, or is it waiting untill I get more symptoms? (as I keep reading about a "window-of-opportunity-for-prevention" in very early RA, but I can't seem to find anything about how to prevent it.
 
Did anyone also get this and how does it influence you?
 
Thanks!
 
 
If I knew then what I knew now, I would take 200mg Minocin a day as well as large doses of probiotics for 16 months.

Also, fish oil.My personal belief that there is no preventative -- early diagnosis is your best bet. Just because you don't have a positive RF, doesn't mean you don't have RA -- as up to 30% or more who have no RF, do have the disease. The high Anti-CCP would be enough to have a referral to an rheumatologist if pain continues.

No preventative measures that I know of.
 
The Anti-CCP is highly specific for RA, and as IslandWoman already pointed out, the RF test doesn't have to be positive for you to have RA.  I'm glad you have an appointment with a Rheumatologist, because early treatment is important if it turns out to be RA.
Pandora -
 
There are many theories on what's happening to our bodies with these AI diseases.  The prevalent theory is 'auto immune'.  Another theory, which is gaining ground with other area's of medicine like microbioiogy etc is either the Danger Model or the Infectious model.  Gogo, myself, and a few other of us on AI subscribe to the latter theory.  Like GoGo said, if I knew then (when this was going down) what I know now, there are a lot of things I would have done to avoid this.
 
1) get the book - the New Arthritis Breakthrough by Henry Scammell available on Amazon.
 
2) get on some antibiotics long term usually Minocin (generic is minocycline) - at least 2 years (don't know why GoGo said 16 months).  Lurk on www.roadback.org because it's a lot of info to take in and repeatedly hearing it might help you understand what is happening to your body.
 
3) get on probiotics  - the good stuff - usually found in the refrigerated section of whole foods.  Get the most live encapsulations and the most varied strains you can.  Make sure you take enough to keep you 'regular' bowel wise.
 
4) sleep.  If your sleep pattern is abnormal you are going to continue onto this road into AI disease.  Fix it ASAP.  Look into natural remedies if you can - melatonin etc.  Your body uses deep sleep to heal and that includes cellular repair. 
 
5) cleanses - try milk thistle or the Whole Lemon/Olive Oil Drink (search here) to help your body process as many toxins out of your body as possible.  The WL/OO drink also works to help the sleep cycle if you take it 1 to 1 1/2 hours before bed (or you'll be getting up to use the loo).
 
6) stress - get rid of it.  Totally.  You posted you've had a couple of days of severe pain that went away then came back.  How long between cycles?  This sounds like Palindromic RA, which I have.  If you have to get one of these diseases, this is the version to get.  There is something in our bodies that fight like hell to beat this - it fails - but it's trying to beat it.  If your attacks are coming on during stress times - whatever the stress is - dump it.  I wish I would have. 
 
7) change your diet.  Pick any one of the 'anti-inflammatory' ones you want to try.  Personally, I wish I'd have gone gluten free then because there is nothing like tremendous pain to make you do what you should.  I'm nearing remission so don't have the pain any more - so keep putting off doing the diet thing which NEEDS to be addressed.  Think of it this way - a few years of gluten free, healthy diet choices and antibiotics - or 40+ years of hellacious PRA/RA pain?  My research is showing a huge connection to the 'leaky gut' and the onsets of these diseases.  If I hope to go medicine free, I have to do the diet, icky tho it is. 
 
The CCP is supposed to be definitive.  I'm thinking it's a bit more fluid than they think.  I was low positive when I started AP but apparently was over twice that number on diagnosis 5 months earlier.  I am now CCP negative and my only hold over is the stupid RF - still at over 300.  Sigh. 
 
Hugs and hope you can beat this. 
 
Pip
Pip,
 
Anti-CCP can show up years before you actually develop RA.  As I recall, your PR did change to RA at one time.
Pip, I said 16 months because that's what Dr. Mirkin says.

Pandora, I strenuously urge you to listen to this short radio broadcast---it should take you about 5 minutes. First he talks about a cross dressing runner, but after that he talks to a man who's mom is in the same position you are. PLEASE listen to this:
http://www.drmirkin.com/mp3s/hour228.mp3

Thank you all very much for the tips!

I have indeed read about the infectious model and was thinking in that direction as I actually work with one of the bugs that might cause it. I'll definitely mention that to the rheumatologist when i have my appointment next week. But the problem there is that the bug causing the anti-CCP antibodies moght already be long gone, although the antibodies will still e there and cause problem. This is also the case in other microbe-induced auto-immune diseases like guillain-barre syndrom. So trying to kill the bug when it's no longer there might not be the best option 
 
I'm also not a big fan of long-term antibiotics, as they usually mess up your normal gut (micro)flora which might give a lot of gut problems. (and actually increase the problem, if it is indeed gut-related) The probiotics and diet options are good suggestions though, especially if I have to go on antibiotics.  (the sleep and stress is always good for you, so I try that already)
 
On the other hand, it sort of feels strange to take all these measures without actually having a lot of symptoms. But better try to prevent it, I guess.
 
I had never heard of palindromic RA, but that surely describes it! Very severe pain for a day or two and after that feeling normal. I've now had 3 epsiodes about 2-3 weeks apart. Haven't had any problems since the GP gave my NSAID's untill I have my appointment.
 
About Dr. Mirkin: He might have a point, although usually I find the papers he refers to do not always state what he makes of it. And to call papers from 1997 and 1998 recent also doesn't really improve that. It's part of my job to read these kind of papers and for a lot of things he says there are just as many papers saying the opposite.
However, if a lot people benefit by his suggestions that's great!  
 
Thanks again for all the tips & suggestions!
 
Pandora,
 
Here is the link to the International Palindromic Rheumatism Society. Lots of palindromic info and also a great forum:
http://www.palindromicrheumatism.org/
LEV
Well, the Mother Bug is gone, but the Baby Bug is till there:


Mycoplasmas - Stealth Pathogens



By Leslie Taylor, ND
January, 2001
Mycoplasmas are a specific and unique species of bacteria - the smallest free-living organism known on the planet. The primary differences between mycoplasmas and other bacteria is that bacteria have a solid cell-wall structure and they can grow in the simplest culture media. Mycoplasmas however, do not have a cell wall, and like a tiny jellyfish with a pliable membrane, can take on many different shapes which make them difficult to identify, even under a high powered electron microscope. Mycoplasmas can also be very hard to culture in the laboratory and are often missed as pathogenic causes of diseases for this reason.

The accepted name was chosen because Mycoplasmas were observed to have a fungi-like structure (Mycology is the study of fungi - hence "Myco") and it also had a flowing plasma-like structure without a cell wall - hence "plasma". The first strains were isolated from cattle with arthritis and pleuro-pneumonia in 1898 at the Pasteur Institute. The first human strain was isolated in 1932 from an abscessed wound. The first connection between mycoplasmas and rheumatoid diseases was made in 1939 by Drs. Swift and Brown. Unfortunately, mycoplasmas didn't become part of the medical school curriculum until the late 1950's when one specific strain was identified and proven to be the cause of atypical pneumonia, and named Mycoplasma pneumonia. The association between immunodeficiency and autoimmune disorders with mycoplasmas was first reported in the mid 1970s in patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia (an autoimmune disease) and infection with four species of mycoplasma that had localized in joint tissue. Since that time, scientific testing methodologies have made critical technological progress and along with it, more mycoplasma species have been identified and recorded in animals, humans and even plants.

While Mycoplasma pneumonia is certainly not the only species causing disease in humans, it makes for a good example of how this stealth pathogen can move out of it's typical environment and into other parts of the body and begin causing other diseases. While residing in the respiratory tract and lungs, Mycoplasma pneumonia remains an important cause of pneumonia and other airway disorders, such as tracheobronchitis, pharyngitis and asthma. When this stealth pathogen hitches a ride to other parts of the body, it is associated with non-pulmonary manifestations, such as blood, skin, joint, central nervous system, liver, pancreas, and cardiovascular syndromes and disorders. Even as far back as 1983, doctors at Yale noted:

"Over the past 20 years the annual number of reports on extrapulmonary symptoms during Mycoplasma (M.) pneumoniae disease has increased. Clinical and epidemiological data indicate that symptoms from the skin and mucous membranes, from the central nervous system, from the heart, and perhaps from other organs as well are not quite uncommon manifestations of M. pneumoniae disease."(15)

This single stealth pathogen has been discovered in the urogenital tract of patients suffering from inflammatory pelvic disease, urethritis, and other urinary tract diseases (8) It has been discovered in the heart tissues and fluid of patients suffering from cardititis, pericarditis, tachycardia, hemolytic anemia, and other coronary heart diseases.(9, 10, 14) It has been found in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with meningitis and encephalitis, seizures, ALS, Alzheimer's and other central nervous system infections, diseases and disorders.(11-13) It has even been found regularly in the bone marrow of children with leukemia.(16- 18) It is amazing that one single tiny bacteria can be the cause of so many seemingly unrelated diseases in humans. But as with all mycoplasma species, the disease is directly related to where the mycoplasma resides in the body and which cells in the body it attaches to or invades.

Today, over 100 documented species of mycoplasmas have been recorded to cause various diseases in humans, animals, and plants. Mycoplasma pneumonia as well as at least 7 other mycoplasma species have now been linked as a direct cause or significant co-factor to many chronic diseases including, rheumatoid arthritis, Alzheimer's, multiple sclerosis, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, diabetes, Crohn's Disease, ALS, nongonoccal urethritis, asthma, lupus, infertility, AIDS and certain cancers and leukemia, just to name a few.(1-6) In 1997, the National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases, published the article, Mycoplasmas: Sophisticated, Reemerging, and Burdened by Their Notoriety, by Drs. Baseman and Tully who stated:


"Nonetheless, mycoplasmas by themselves can cause acute and chronic diseases at multiple sites with wide-ranging complications and have been implicated as cofactors in disease. Recently, mycoplasmas have been linked as a cofactor to AIDS pathogenesis and to malignant transformation, chromosomal aberrations, the Gulf War Syndrome, and other unexplained and complex illnesses, including chronic fatigue syndrome, Crohn's disease, and various arthritides."

Mycoplasmas, unlike viruses, can grow in tissue fluids (blood, joint, heart, chest and spinal fluids) and can grow inside any living tissue cell without killing the cells, as most normal bacteria and viruses will do. Mycoplasmas are frequently found in the oral and genito-urinary tracts of normal healthy people and are found to infect females four times more often than males, which just happens to be the same incidence rate in rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, Chronic Fatigue and other related disorders.(7) Mycoplasmas are parasitic in nature and can attach to specific cells without killing the cells and thus their infection process and progress can go undetected. In some people the attachment of mycoplasmas to the host cell acts like a living thorn; a persistent foreign substance, causing the host's immune defense mechanism to wage war. This allergic type of inflammation often results in heated, swollen, and painful inflamed tissues, like those found in rheumatoid diseases, fibromyalgia and many other autoimmune disorders like lupus and MS, Crohn's and others. In such cases the immune system begins attacking itself and/or seemingly healthy cells. Some species of mycoplasmas also have the unique ability to completely evade the immune system. Once they attach to a host cell in the body, their unique plasma and protein coating can then mimic the cell wall of the host cell and the immune system cannot differentiate the mycoplasma from the body's own host cell.

Mycoplasmas are parasitic in nature because they rely on the nutrients found in host cells including cholesterol, amino acids, fatty acids and even DNA. They especially thrive in cholesterol rich and arginine-rich environments. Mycoplasmas can generally be found in the mucous membrane in the respiratory tract. They need cholesterol for membrane function and growth, and there is an abundance of cholesterol in the bronchial tubes of the respiratory tract. Once attached to a host cell, they then begin competing for nutrients inside the host cells. As nutrients are depleted, then these host cells can begin to malfunction, or even change normal functioning of the cell, causing a chain reaction with other cells (especially within the immune and endocrine systems). Mycoplasmas can even cause RNA and DNA mutation of the host cells and have been linked to certain cancers for this reason. Mycoplasmas can also invade and live inside host cells which evade the immune system, especially white blood cells. Once inside a white blood cell, mycoplasmas can travel throughout the body and even cross the blood/brain barrier, and into the central nervous system and spinal fluid.


FOOTNOTES

Baseman, Joel, et.al., Mycoplasmas: Sophisticated, Reemerging, and Burdened by Their Notoriety, CDC, Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol 3, No.1, Feb 1997
S-C. Mycoplasmas and AIDS. In: Maniloff J, McElhaney RN, Finch LR, Baseman JB, editors. Mycoplasmas: molecular biology and pathogenesis. Washington (DC): American Society for Microbiology, 1992:525-45.
Nicolson G, Nicolson NL. Diagnosis and treatment of mycoplasmal infections in Gulf War illness-CFIDS patients. Intl J Occup Med Immunol Toxicol 1996;5:69-78.
Wear DJ, et.al. Mycoplasmas and oncogenesis:persistent infection and multistage malignant transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:10197-201.
Ekbom A, Daszak P, Kraaz W, Wakefield AJ. Crohn's disease after in-utero measles virus exposure. Lancet 1996;348:516-7.
Taylor-Robinson D. Mycoplasmas in rheumatoid arthritis and other human arthritides. J Clin Pathol 1996;49:781-2.
Dr.Harold Clark, The Intercessor, June 1993, The Road Back Foundation, Delaware OH.
Goulet M, et.al., Isolation of Mycoplasma pneumoniae from the human urogenital tract. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2823-5
Daxbock F, et.al., Severe hemolytic anemia and excessive leukocytosis masking mycoplasma pneumonia. Ann Hematol. 2001 Mar;80(3):180-2.
Higuchi ML, et.al., Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae in ruptured atherosclerotic plaques. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2000 Sep;33(9):1023-6.
Socan M, Neurological symptoms in patients whose cerebrospinal fluid is culture- and/or polymerase chain reaction-positive for Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Jan 15;32(2):E31-5.
Bencina D, et.al., Intrathecal synthesis of specific antibodies in patients with invasion of the central nervous system by Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000 Jul;19(7):521-30
Smith R, et.al., Neurologic manifestations of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections: diverse spectrum of diseases. A report of six cases and review of the literature. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2000 Apr;39(4):195-201.
Umemoto M, Advanced atrioventricular block associated with atrial tachycardia caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1995 Aug;37(4):518-20.
Lind K. Manifestations and complications of Mycoplasma pneumoniae disease: a review.Yale J Biol Med. 1983 Sep-Dec;56(5-6):461-8.
Alexander FE. Is Mycoplasma Pneumonia associated with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia? Cancer Causes Control. 1997 Sep;8(5):803-11.
Hall JE, Mycoplasma pneumonia in acute childhood leukemia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1985 Nov-Dec;1(6):333-6.
Murphy WH, Gullis C, Dabich L, Heyn R, Zarafonetis CJD. Isolation of Mycoplasma from leukemic and nonleukemia patients. J Nat Cancer Inst 1970;45:243-51.
More research here



To understand how mycoplasmas can cause widespread disease, we must first look at the species' unique properties and interactions with host cells. Unlike viruses and bacteria, mycoplasmas are the smallest free-living and self-duplicating microorganisms, as they don't require living cells to replicate their DNA and growth.


Read more:

http://www.rain-tree.com/myco.htm

(PS...I'm not really sure if the age of studies is relevant, unless, of course, new contradictory information has been discovered since then. People figure stuff out and then move on to the next thing, they don't reinvent the wheel over and over again)Hi GoGo
 
The link would have been sufficient, as I not really needed an update on what mycoplasma is. Although I agree with this paper that mycoplasma is definitely a parasitic bacteria that hides in cells and might be a co-factor in all sorts of illnesses including arthritis, this does not mean arthritis is (always) caused by mycoplasma. Inflammation caused by any organism can give "heated, swollen, and painful inflamed tissues" that's the definition of inflammation.
 
Mycoplasma can definitely give rise to a wide variety of diseases, but it's implication in arthritis are not that well founded. This can also be seen by the list of references given here. The only one specific about arthritis is "Mycoplasmas in rheumatoid arthritis and other human arthritides" where the author himself says as last sentence: "Whether M.(ycoplasma) fermentans is a major contributor and whether the presence of mycoplasmas is a consequence rather than a cause of the arthritis remains to be seen."
That is exactly why I ask about recent literature: has a direct correlation been found in humans since 1996?
 
My conclusion: These types of publications give a very one-sided point of view and could be written about any organism that is implicated in an auto-immune disorder that gives inflammation.
 
Although I do not conclude it is nonsense I would not adjust my whole life-style based on such poor evidence, provided by someone who actually sells the remedies (the rain-tree website). I'd first prefer some scientific evidence-based papers
 
 
 
Pandora, no problem. You asked if there was any way to head RA off at the pass, this is one (and maybe the only) solution offered to you that has worked for some people. It's definitely up to you if you want to take the suggestion or not.

If anyone had a sure thing or knew what causes RA, none of us would be here now. So you could try this, or something else, or just let the RA take it's course. It doesn't really matter to me which one you pick.PS...no one is really making huge profits of sales of off patent tetracycline antibiotics. I doubt "rain-tree" would make a penny if you decided to follw that course.LOL Pandora - of course the Infectious theory people are very one sided - as if the Autoimmune theory people are any less so.
 
I agree with GoGo - you have to make a choice which 'cult' you're going to go with.  I can tell you this - we've a 90% success rate with AP for PRA peeps.   With regular RA, it's about 75% - almost twice the biologics. 
 
I'm telling you one thing tho, as somebody that went on from PRA to RA and back to PRA again, and who is nearing remission - RA is NOT something you want to mess around with.  If you can avoid it, DO IT!  We're the one AI disease, IMHO, that tries like hell to beat this disease - use your body to FIGHT! 
 
Pip
Pip, where do you get the statistics from?

That was my question.  Not to be argumentative, but it seems to be a high success rate if true.

Pandora - glad you have an appt.  I'd say it's more of a "window-of-opportunity-for-remission, not preventation"  Whatever treatment you decide on, I wish the best.

Cathy
Unfortunately, they don't count.  Those are just the people I've helped.  If I could figure out a way to get that turned into a study....
 
Hugs,
 
Pip
Oh, Pip!, girl, that was so misleading.
 
It would be nice if that was the actual scientific study results.  When I first developed RA, my RD said right up front he wouldn't prescribe AP.  He said tried treating some of his patients with it and wasn't pleased with the results.  So, in his practice, he didn't see the 90% you've seen with people on this site.  Makes me wonder, though, what the difference is.  How many people do you feel your 90% represents?
 
And that's part of the reason I think we need these docs to start tracking us.  On AF there we're 2 people with strokes and 2 with cancer in the same year period I was hanging out there.  But if you were to suggest to a doc that it might possibly be the meds we're using, they immediately switch over to 'it's the nature of the disease'.  So, now they're looking at how some abx can cause liver failure - but have we seen the same type of study for the biologics?  And I bet we don't.  Nobody is going to shoot a money maker in the foot. 
 
When I first found the Roadback and started hanging out there I looked for patterns.  My totally non-scientific-study-of-one found 2 distinct herx patterns - 1) drop to the floor or 2) easing of symptoms until we hit remission.  Another thing that kept showing up is "My doc says this won't work" for a variety of reasons - 1) you'll get Lupus 2) it only works for mild 3) I save that for the severe (give me a freakin' break) and the ever popular 4) you'll turn into a Smurf.  (My mom is developing that on her legs and guess what - she feels good and can now sleep at night - she doesn't care!).  So, when I went to the Great U and talked to my rheumy - I got told about Plaq.  I freaked and kept researching and then my hubby went back with me AND with the book The New Arthritis Breakthrough in his hands and my rheumy said, 'well, it's better than any medicine I can offer you".  Mind you, this is 4 MONTHS after first approaching him and him knowing I wanted antivirals or some sort of anti-infective because I kept linking this to my teeth.  He said the teeth were 'coincidence' and that he wouldn't monitor me.  I flew to LA, got one of the best AP docs in the world to be my doc and he was monitoring me from out of state but I kept going in to see my rheumy who then told me he had a 'few' patients on AP and they were doing well.  WTF??? Then, when my mom was trying to get AP for her OA my SIL contacted my rheumy asking what he knew about AP etc and he told her "we don't really do that here at the Great U".  WTF???  Not only did he have patients that did well on AP - he just told my Mom (thru my SIL) that it didn't work. 
 
I am not impressed by the Great U.
 
Another interesting thing I noticed on the Roadback was some AP docs do not prescribe probiotics - WTF???  Those on AP that start to fail get told to start probiotics - and low and behold - they stop failing.  Gee!  So, my guess is your doc, if he's telling the truth about his experiences (as my doc wasn't) then 1) he didn't do probiotics with abx and that's a recipe for failure or 2) he's doing the 'you have 2 months and then we'll switch over to the 'real meds'.  Does mtx, plaq etc (same DMARD level) work in that time frame?  What have we seen here?  Heck, the biologics rarely work in that amount of time. 
 
But, if you don't keep seeing the same thing over and over then it doesn't sink in.  Most of us are 'magic little pill' believers - give me my med and make this all go away.  Yeah, right.  So, if you try AP for a few months, and it doesn't 'work' then you might give up if you don't have people saying 'please, keep going, it's worth it'. 
 
My 90% PRA peeps are from different sites.  Some people on the IPRS contacted me via PM like they do here.  Some never posted.  Some joined the Roadback.  I'd guess I'm at 9 out of 10 on PRA people but it might be more like 11 out of 12.  The 75% of regular RA peeps are mostly from here.  I think quite a lot of Roadbackers were people I sent there.  But I can't convince somebody to keep going if they're not getting support from their docs or their families.  You know 'crazy internet people' don't beat 'medical school training'.  LOL
 
This is part of the reason I'm redoing my filing system (still taken apart) and organizing my studies.  I intend to contact the people I lost touch with and see how they're doing.  And if they 'failed' was it probiotics?  Something else?  Whatever.  Because it seems the only person interested in tracking APer's - is me. 
 
The difference?  It's probiotics, proaction and perserverance. 
 
This is why I'm thinking AP will work for everybody - and yes, nobody in the world says that except for me.
 
Another thing that interests me is the MIRA study.  In the book, the New Arthritis Breakthrough, they point out that Minocycline still passed as a DMARD even tho there were all of these protocol violations.  I only read that part once, but the part that got me is they somehow score studies with when you have to break protocol.  So, the regular DMARD's (MTX?) had X amount of 'violations' in which they had to administer some other meds to get it to work.  Minocycline had a similar amount of X violations - get this - because the patients stopped needing PAIN KILLERS!  Give me a freakin' break - they counted 'getting better' as a VIOLATION!!!
 
Go look at that link GoGo posted about the Bill Moyers interview with Melody Petersen.  About half way thru there is a part about 'there are a lot of ways to make your study look better.  If you want it to look better than an older drug, you raise the dose so they get more side effects and if you want..."
 
Yeah, we're told all the 'truth' of these studies by Pharma. 
 
MIRA was designed to fail - it still didn't - that tells me that we have a pretty darn good shot trying this.
 
Hugs,
 
Pip
So basically what you're saying Pip is that you have no proof, just anecdotal evidence.......
 
I think you know that most anecdotes about health are very often useless.  As with any illness,  in RA  some number of patients will get well anyway, no matter what treatment they receive.

Anecdotes are also  particularly unverifiable, especially in RA....A disease that waxes and wanes sometimes without any rhyme or reason.......

I'm doing well on Rituxan....No side effects, less meds, no new damage.  The studies concerning Rituxan back those kind of results up.
I never give a lot of credence to "My doctor tried it and she/he said....", because I strongly suspect those doctors didn't look to far beyond the studies, which all use 200mg every day. They probably do not fine tune or try long enough---the therapy does usually take a bit longer than a few months.

Imagine if every doctor just prescribed 10mg MTX, didn't know anything about polytherapies that can go with it, tried it for, say, 4 weeks only, and never adjusted the dose?

So I consider those statements also anecdotal evidence. I am only interested in what docs who really know the therapy say about clinical efficacy.Pip,
 
Don't you ever get embarrassed? You post that statistics show that 90% of PRA sufferers treated with minocin are cured and that 75% of RA sufferers are cured with minocin and when you are called on it, you just explain that those statistics are from "your" studies taken from "your" patients that "you" have cured. You and Gimpy are so funny. As far as the MIRA report, the ACR dismissed it for being flawed and corupted because the patients that were given an anti-biotic were also given anti-inflamatories, therefore corrupting the findings. But I must say Pip, thank you so much for such a good laugh. Your study indeed. Thanks again.
 
LEV
ROFLMAO, this is too much, throwing out statistics from your patients.  probably people you have never met...Lev is right, you should be embarrassed about all this Pipology you throw out there...I guess you are writing a book to follow????

GoGo & Pip

Apparently you have no idea how difficult it is to set up these trials with correct controls (without withholding therapy from people who need it). All the anecdotal stuff is really nice for the people who actually got better and it might be worth trying if nothing else is working.
I'd actually would like a reference to the flawed minocin study, so I can have a look at it myself. Does anyone have a ref for me?
 
I'd like to look at all kind of options and be well informed, so thanks for all suggestions...
by the way, what is Roadback?
Minocycline in Reumatoid Arthritis:
http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/122/2/81

Road Back:
http://www.roadback.org/

The MIRA study is quite old now. It was commissioned a couple weeks after the death of the doctor who devoted his life to researching antibiotics to treat rheumatic diseases.With your superiour research skills and discerning analytical mind, you should have no problem finding quite a few studies on the topic. I'm hoping when you find a good solution to your problem you will let us know for the benefit of others.

Except, Pandora, it's a hell of a longer, harsher, road back to recovery for those who've failed all the traditional meds.  You might lurk on the Roadback - quite of few of them say 'I tried it before, it didn't work, now everything else has failed and I'm going to MAKE this work this time'.  That's the preserverance I was talking about.  With all your research background, you understand the main decision you have to make is, as I've said before, which cult are you buying into?  Infection/Danger Model or Autoimmune?  If you believe in autoimmune - then the choice should be easy - do the traditional road for as long as you can.  Autoimmune sounded like poppycock to me - I chose the Infection Model.  If you run a search on AI there are a bunch more studies you can find links for - or try PubMed - lots of info on 'minocycline' and 'disease of interest'.  Not only RA, Lupus, Scleroderma etc.
 
Nikkilynn - your experience with Rituxin is ancedotal.  Levs experience when Enbrel failed him, and a bit for Rituxin, is the opposite view.  Those pics tell a lot and were useful for me and for that I appreciate it.
 
Please answer the question - why am I getting such higher numbers than the studies?  If they fail, I count it as such.  If they don't, I count it too.  The people I help are told straight up in the beginning - if I help you - you help 2 others. 
 
It's the wave of the future.
 
Pip
[QUOTE=Pip!]Except, Pandora, it's a hell of a longer, harsher, road back to recovery for those who've failed all the traditional meds.  You might lurk on the Roadback - quite of few of them say 'I tried it before, it didn't work, now everything else has failed and I'm going to MAKE this work this time'.  That's the preserverance I was talking about.  With all your research background, you understand the main decision you have to make is, as I've said before, which cult are you buying into?  Infection/Danger Model or Autoimmune?  If you believe in autoimmune - then the choice should be easy - do the traditional road for as long as you can.  Autoimmune sounded like poppycock to me - I chose the Infection Model.  If you run a search on AI there are a bunch more studies you can find links for - or try PubMed - lots of info on 'minocycline' and 'disease of interest'.  Not only RA, Lupus, Scleroderma etc.
 
Nikkilynn - your experience with Rituxin is ancedotal.  Levs experience when Enbrel failed him, and a bit for Rituxin, is the opposite view.  Those pics tell a lot and were useful for me and for that I appreciate it.
 
Please answer the question - why am I getting such higher numbers than the studies?  If they fail, I count it as such.  If they don't, I count it too.  The people I help are told straight up in the beginning - if I help you - you help 2 others. 
 
It's the wave of the future.
 
Pip
[/QUOTE]
 
That's exactly the point!  All your puffing about AP is ancedotal and you have no studies to back up any of your assertions.  At least in my case, I have studies that back up my experience. 
   I'd also like to point out that a lot of people who claim they are doing so well on AP are also still using traditional DMARDS.  And as the studies show, using multiple DMARDS causes improvements in RA................
[QUOTE=Lynn49] That's exactly the point!  All your puffing about AP is ancedotal and you have no studies to back up any of your assertions.  At least in my case, I have studies that back up my experience. 
[/QUOTE]

"Puffing"---that's so rude. Lynne, I wish you would decease your insulting and bullying behaviour.

Pip also has studies to back up her personal experience of doing well on AP. How come your studies are "evidence" and hers are "anecdotal"?

As for, "a lot of people who claim they are doing so well on AP are also still using traditional DMARDS.", as far as I am aware I am the ONLY person here on both AP and DMARDS who is also claiming to be doing well. Most people here who claim they are doing well on AP are only on AP, (as far as I know). You should stop twisting stuff up and exaggerating to serve your purposes."Puffing about AP" is an understatement.  Sorry Pip, I think you need to step back and look at how preposterous your claims sound.
Backing Lynne up on her choice of words doesn't make it any less rude or bullying, it just makes you complicit.

Pip can write about anything she wants, just as we all can. Persoanlly, I find her posts very useful.Hell, she can write that minocin will solve the current economic crisis for all I care.  You're right, she's free to write about it.  Never said anything different.  Still doesn't change how ridiculous the claims sound. Pip,
 
You are such a phoney and a liar. The Enbrel didn't fail me. I was quite satisfied with the results from the enbrel. Pre-enbrel I was a cripple. Almost all of my joint damage was done prior to my enbrel injections. I have explained this to you many times and yet you still want to use my pictures falsley. Picturesthat you ask that I post to prove that I have rheumatoid arthritis and at the time that I took the pictures, my rituxin had worn off and everything was swelling. If you remember, I posted new pictures taken just hours after my new rituxin infusion and all swelling was gone. But, being the lowdown liar that you are, you use the photos that I posted between rituxin infusions and use them to try to convince people that my joint damage was caused because of enbrel showing my swollen joints as proof of the damage caused by enbrel use, when you know for a fact that that is not the truth. How can you live with your nasty self? I explained to all before that almost all of my joint damage was pre-enbrel and that enbrel brought me back to life and stopped the damage and erosion. That's not a lie, that's the truth and you don't like the truth. I see why the PRA forum ran you APers off of their forum. You weren't even embarrassed when you were caught in a lie at the PRA forum, you just made up more lies to try to justify your lies. You even attacked the owner for not deleting your lie. And back to my journey. Even though I was happy with the results of the enbrel, my wonderful University of Michigan doctors thought that I could be even better and prescribed rituxin. The same doctors that you Pip, calls stupid and backwards. The same doctors that Pip claims that she can "school". Oh yeah Pip, we are still waiting to see your claim to ra fame, your infamous bent toe. What a nasty person you are to use my photos and make false statements about the photos, yuckkkk.
 
LEV
 
PS This was the conclusion of the American College of Rheumatology concerning the MIRA study:
 

Although these results are clearly of interest, enthusiasm for minocycline in the treatment of RA must be tempered. The patients in the MIRA trial appeared to have moderately severe disease, and many had required remittive therapy prior to inclusion in the trial. Modest responses were noted for some, but not all, parameters. Both minocycline- and placebo-treated patients showed improvement in joint swelling and tenderness, although statistically significant changes were observed in the comparison of agents. Many patients received either NSAIDs or low-dose corticosteroids during the study which may have influenced disease activity. Furthermore, the duration of response after discontinuation of treatment is unclear. Finally, longer treatment periods and comparison with disease-modifying drugs will be necessary.

Additional trials are required before minocycline can be favorably compared with, or used instead of, current second-line agents in RA.

January 16, 1995

Prepared by Paul Katz, MD, and Robert Thoburn, MD, editors.

Jas -
 
You may consider it puffing, but have you considered, if you tried AP you might not have had to 'stay home with the kids'.
 
Pip
Pandora, I'm in the same boat as you, only my pain has intensified and no longer eases in between bouts.  CCP was 234, a month later 300, all this started three months ago.  I have been on pain relief and have my third appointment with rheumy on Friday, where I will be starting treatment, most likely DMARDS.  We'll see what he says.
 
My research leads me to believe that the DMARDS are where I will begin.  If they don't work (I intend to give them a good shot) I will explore the more radical ones like biologics.  My symptoms did come on hard and fast.
 
I will let you know what my doctor says, Pandora, in hopes that it will help you.  I am leery of the antibiotic regimen.  Good luck.
Minocin will not solve the economic crisis - Obama is the script for that.
 
Pip
Calling it puffing isn't rude, it's descriptive.....
 

puffing n. the exaggeration of the good points of a product, a business, real property, and the prospects for future rise in value, profits and growth. Since a certain amount of "puffing" can be expected of any salesman, it cannot be the basis of a lawsuit for fraud or breach of contract unless the exaggeration exceeds the reality. However, if the puffery includes outright lies or has no basis in fact ("Sears Roebuck is building next door to your store site") a legal action for rescission of the contract or for fraud against the seller is possible.

Sources=Sources | 4096;law()
Oh, the biologics!  I get it now~
 
Pip
Hi Bluehour
 
Sorry to hear your pain has intensified a lot. Hopefully the treatment will work well for you.
 
I was wondering: Did the rheumy didn't want to do anything when you first came in? Or did you get started on NSAID or something? I'm just wondering whether they start any treatment based on just CCP values...
Did your rheumy say anything about what kind of DMARDs
 
To all others:
I am wondering about this big "rivalry" between the people on AP and DMARDs, because as far as I have been able to find it says: the fact that minocycline works is attributed to its immune modifying properties and not the antibacterial properties. It is actually included as an DMARDS in some scientific papers (an example "Drugs to treat inflammation: a historical introduction" Curr Med Chem. 2005;12(25):2931-42.)
 
Very recently (jan 2008) they have found that micocycline inhibits an enzyme called PAD4 which is important in converting peptidyl-arginine into peptiydl-citrulline (and anti-citrilllunated peptide antibodies (CCP) is a sensitive marker for developing RA) (ref:"Profiling Protein Arginine Deiminase 4 (PAD4): a novel screen to identify PAD4 inhibitors".Bioorg Med Chem. 2008 Jan 15;16(2):739-45). This paper also calls minocyclin a chemical DMARDs.  
 
I just don't believe the whole mycoplasma stuff....

Hi Pandora,

For me it started in my finger just before Xmas 2006, just a couple of days of pain - then it went away and came again about 2 mths later in the other finger and went away after a couple of days then it happened on the back of my right hand then in Apr 07 both hands - then I went to the doctor, got referred to a rheumatologist and the rest is history.
 
For the rheumatologists appts I took X-rays with me -- they diagnosed PA or Palindromic Arthritis late Nov 2007, they said there was absolutely no doubt in their minds I did not have RA !! but were adamant that I should start taking plaquenil & methtrexate straight away, when I asked why they said it may delay me getting RA if I was going to get RA -- the one thing all 3 rheumatologists agreed on was --- you have PA or PRA (whichever you prefer to call it) we don't know how you get it and we don't know how you treat it but you have it..... Wow, a diagnosis -  great !!
 
The only problem then was that I had no intention of taking methatrexate or plaquenil to stop something I didn't have just in case it might stop me getting it in the future.  Mtx is a heavy med and I knew it would screw with my own immune system and didn't like the possible side effects.  So I started researching it in Jan this year and changed my diet in March to dairy gluten free amongst other things and started AP in June 2008.  To me I had nothing to lose and everything to win by trying AP first, why wouldn't I...
 
My advice is ---- Research the condition you have, listen, read and learn; then make an informed decision as to what treatment path you would prefer to take, then reassess your position as time goes on. 
 
My goal is remission in 3 yrs & I am so glad I chose this path to go down.
 
Good Luck in whatever you choose, it really is up to you.
Maz 
 
 ps - Although I know Minocycline seems to be the prefered tetracycline for those on AP, my doctor has chosen to target the specific bacteria/germs/mycoplasma or whatever they have identified is floating around in my system, so I take different abx to others on AP, but I am still on the programme. (the AP programme that is)
Maz-aust2008-12-03 17:41:32Well, if you go to Roadback, you will see most people are on DMARDS and AP, have constant side effects they blow off as herxing, have major stomach problems etc.
Also how does ABX kill VIRUS oh all knowing one?? LOL
Whats your title to your book?? "Kick em to the curb if they dont have success with your CURE" or better yet.."you all are MORONS"  ROFLMAO
[QUOTE=Pandora] Hi Bluehour











[/QUOTE]

I think people here can't deal with the fact that maybe they could have been helped or avoided joint damge by drugs with less potential known side effects than biologics, hence the extreme animosity towards other people's medical decisions. And then some people are just sort of obnoxious and love drama. You sure don't see people demanding people justify their use of conventional drugs like APers are constantly subjected to. That's just my opinion, of course.

I'm not as concerned with why AP works, more just that it does work.

I'm sure you're intelligent to compare the different options and make the right choice for you. Good luck with whatever you decide.As stated numerous times there is no problem that it works for some, but to make outrageous claims that it will cure everyone is the problem.  To lead people down a path of possible further joint damage is unthinkable.  MORON!!!Great, now even the "newbies" are resorting to being rude and name calling.   I've made the contacts I need in this board and will remain friends with these people.  I'm deleting my membership.  If anyone would like to keep in touch and be productive in sharing you can email me at Kristin    goldie1605@hotmail.com
 
Good luck to the rest of you.
Well everyone is different as we can tell by this thread. I hope not to many people were scared off by this? I personally am allergic to tetracycline so i can not take it. I do believe it lowers the immune system just like other RA meds. As it has simalar properties to other drugs that lower the immune system. Look up the word Macrolide. Also it is an antiinflamatory. I personnaly am taking an anti malaria, anti amebic, anti viral, drug that is being used in cancer studies. It suppresses the immune system and i am so far not allergic to it. Chloriquine Phosphate 500 mg. So yes many different medicines and many different opinions. Keep reading and good luck with what ever you choose. It's scary and none of us ever know if we are making the right decision. Sorry if anyone was that smart we wouldn't have these problems. Most people go threw many medicines in the course of this disease. So to anyone that is doing well on a medicine thats great. But it is a tough thing to go threw. I hope you stick around and chat with us.Oh good grief, minocin is a DMARDS
 
http://arthritis.about.com/od/minocin/Minocin_Minocycline_Dosage_Side_Effects_Drug_Interactions.htm
 
Minocin (minocycline) drug information, dosage, side effects, drug interactions, and warnings. Minocin, generic drug name minocycline, is an antibiotic also used as a DMARD (disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug). Minocin is used to treat mild rheumatoid arthritis and other rheumatic conditions.
 
If you are going to rake Pip over the coals, at least be honest with your remarks. 
From the American College of Rheumatology, minocin is a DMARDS:
 
http://www.rheumatology.org/public/factsheets_original/ra.asp

Successful management of RA requires early diagnosis and, at times, aggressive treatment. Patients with an established diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis should begin treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). DMARDs are often used in conjunction with NSAIDs and/or low dose corticosteroids. DMARDs have greatly improved the symptoms and function as well as the quality of life for the vast majority of patients with RA. DMARDs include methotrexate (Rheumatrex and Folex), leflunomide (Arava), hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil), sulfasalazine (Azulfidine), gold given orally (Auranofin) or intramuscularly (Myochrisine), minocycline (Minocin, Dynacin and Vectrin), azathiaprine (Imuran), and cyclosporine (Sandimmune and Neoral).

Posters who are complaining about other posters should have their science and facts right before posting stupidities. 
justsaynoemore2008-12-03 19:29:22That is what i was trying to say. Minocin is an RA medicine just like other RA medicine. So I do see the problem in people taking it if it works for them.Milly, I heard you.  Closed minds cannot be opened with facts.  I hope you are doing well tonight and good luck with that pain/no pain cycle you are in.  I am now a month into having the stiffness and pain in my fingers suddenly disappear, and then suddenly last week my strength return to my hands and wrists.  AP (minocin) therapy says substantial results are not attained until after a year and I am at 15 months.  I am so happy I found this Board with people like Pip who are committed to letting other victims of RA know there is a different way.  I am so glad you are doing well. My body doesn't allow for much chioce sometimes. I have only been on this new medicine eight days. Ouch!! Had a few weeks in limbo. Trying to get caught up. But i do not feel sick all of the time on this medicine. Mostly just the pain and swelling problem at the moment. No fatigue and that is saying a bunch.Milly, after a week on AP my ice cold hand from a bad neck injury suddenly warmed back up.  Then the fatigue and feeling sick went away.  No fatigue is HUGE.  I totally understand as I was amazed when it happened, and it happened within the first few months on AP.  I am so glad you are getting some relief of one of our hardest symptoms to deal with - I hope and pray it keeps improving for you, as you have had a very rough time of it.  Congrats.  CathyI do wish that it didn't have to be a rivalry.  I think more people should be open to considering AP, but I think AP also need to be open to considering that maybe AP isn't a magic bullet that works every time, or that is appropriate for everyone.  I know that Enbrel may or may not work, and AP may or may not work.  It's not asprin for a headache, it's so much more complicated than that.  And asprin doesn't even work for a headache every time! :) I think the turn off is just the air of "my treatment is better than your treatment" (from either side).  Why is it that people resort to name calling & what seems to be this constant attempt to prove someone else wrong - what happened to listening to all the arguments and then if necessary agreeing to disagree.
 
I don't believe anyone can say the traditional methods (of treating RA or PRA or whatever AI disease you have) categorically work, anymore than people who are trying AP can say it categorically works, but people - it is a science and science is not black and white -- doctors give different medications to different patients for the same things every day, doctors prescribe different doses of the same medication for different people every day.
 
The salient point here is to remember is that it is up to you to decide what you will and will not do (with the support of your medical team).
 
Just because I don't happen to agree with your method of treatment does not mean I won't read and listen with interest as to your progress.
 
I choose to treat my own disease with diet and AP Therapy, my closest girlfriend is choosing to treat her severe RA the traditional way with cortizone, plaquenil & methatrexate, my husband has psoriasis and chooses to treat it with methatrexate, (successfully I may add).  Do I want to take mtx , no I don't..... but that is my choice.
 
Being new to this community I am concerned by the way some people go out of their way to personally attack others just to somehow prove a point.  Surely all anyone wants is to feel better.  However they choose to make that happen is up to them, and yes I want to hear about it.
 
 
 
 
Maz-aust2008-12-03 20:00:09Hi Milly!  Missed you!
 
The question originally was - what can stop this.  As we know, a positive CCP is supposed to mean the RA elephant is in the room.  Is it possible to make it back up and go out the door?  I think so.
 
Hugs,
 
Pip
Well, the argument is never about who should be using what.  Whatever side of the fence people are on, both say "go ahead and use what you want, I hope it works for you".  The fight is always that the other side is misrepresenting data.  It's about which side has more accurate studies.  And their is always the underlying tone that the other side is corrupt and if you believe what they say you're kind of a dimwit.Pharma is corrupt.  There are JAMA articles that prove it.
 
 
Pip

See?

Linc - look up!

See the 'wink'.
 
Hugs,
 
Pip
lol......I see the wink now.
 
missed it the first time though.
[QUOTE=Pip!]Jas - ah Maz, there is no name calling here.  If you will notice I am just mirroring back the favorite words of the Holy trinity. again notice their favorite words about anyone
 
MORONS (Pip & JSNM personal favorites)
IDIOTS
STUPID
AND THE LIST GOES ON
 
and for jas to have to explain why she is a stay at home mom is silly, considering if you PIP were doing so good why are you not working????
Give me a break
 
JasmineRain sorry to hear about your husband. All this extra work is such a burden for you. I will say a prayer and hope you hit the lottery so you can hire out the snow shoveling. We were just talking about hearing how much snow was falling up north. Just dreadful. Try to get some rest when you can. I am proud of you but do not hurt yourself. No one person can do everything all the time even if you think you have to. We will have to increase your Coca-cola to the max dosage if this keeps up. Take a nice hot bath. [QUOTE=mabus]ah Maz, there is no name calling here.  If you will notice I am just mirroring back the favorite words of the Holy trinity. again notice their favorite words about anyone [QUOTE=JasmineRain] [QUOTE=Pip!]Jas -
 
You may consider it puffing, but have you considered, if you tried AP you might not have had to 'stay home with the kids'.
 
Pip
[/QUOTE]

If you recall, my reasons for "staying home with the kids" (is that some kind of put-down or something?) were numerous.  I am now working 30 hours a week at my "real job" which often involves moving computer equipment and automation hardware around ("project manager" seems to mean "glorified gopher" at times) and standing on my feet for hours on end.  My SAHM duties involve the usual - cooking, cleaning, and now shoveling snow, as my cardiac husband is not allowed near a shovel.  We don't have maids, butlers, or servants, or nannies.  My husband works long hours, so most of the housework now falls solely on my shoulders.  In addition, I usually spend 20 hours or more a week at church/school activities.  I just got back from 6 hours on my feet at Bingo, as a matter of fact.  Tonight I had 10 cases of pop to haul downstairs, and several huge trashbags up the stairs at the end of the night.  I am also a GOP precint committeewomman.  During election season, I spent lots of time walking the precincts, distributing campaign literature.  I also spend 20 to 30 hours per month attending local government meetings - some of which I am the (volunteer) videographer for.  It's exhausting, and the occasional RA manifestation certainly puts a crimp in my style.  Thankfully they've been few and far between.  As I've mentioned frequently, most of my pain issues these days are from "stupid human tricks" and no antibiotic is going to prevent or repair an overuse injury, sprain or strain.  I'm almost 40 and I don't get as much exercise as I should... so hauling a dozen 90-pound monitors around at work or shoveling our 50-foot driveway is gonna cause some repercusions the next day.

I've never said minocin or the other antibiotics don't work - I just don't think they're the end-all be-all RA cure.  I don't believe every case of RA is caused by some phantom microbe.  Minocin, high-dose omega-3's, biologicals - they all inhibit TNF and/or other inflammatory substances, as well as having other anti-inflammatory properties.  I think the "herx" claim is over-used for issues on antibiotic therapy.  I don't think that AP and other treatments should be in competition.  I'm not telling everyone to modify their diets and take fish oil to alter their omega-6/omega-3 ratio... the studies show it doesn't work for everyone.  It happens to work for me.
[/QUOTE]
 
Well said JasmineRain, very well said........... [QUOTE=milly]JasmineRain sorry to hear about your husband. All this extra work is such a burden for you. I will say a prayer and hope you hit the lottery so you can hire out the snow shoveling. We were just talking about hearing how much snow was falling up north. Just dreadful. Try to get some rest when you can. I am proud of you but do not hurt yourself. No one person can do everything all the time even if you think you have to. We will have to inc