they weren't "questions to you" that you posted for me .. they were your opinion of what I wrote twisted .. like Lyme is not infectious
I was directing the Second WW comment to you since it piqued your interest...
the Ms Straw inference is because you constantly call someone else out on straw dogs when you are the best at it!
I'm perfectly fine w/ discussing opposing viewpoints and giving information about other opinions ...... but I'd hope they'd be a little more intelligent than Lymes being engineered after WW2 and changes into "Oldtimers" in it's late stage.. and comparing Lymes to Syphilis.
I look forward to the next link......................................... I'll have half my brain ready..
ETA: I dont understand why everyone posts why they edited???
babs102008-12-08 19:26:27cah, I haven't seen the movie myself but I have read quite a bit about Lyme and the medical controversy around it, so I'm keeping my eyes open for a screening near me. (I'm not sure why Babs thinks Lyme has been documented as far back as the 1880's, since I was under the impression it was discovered in the 1970's.)
There's a lot of people who still believe Lyme is confined to only a few geographocal areas. However, it has been pretty well established that instances of Lyme are much more widespread than those areas. I'm not sure why. Indeed, I think a lot of people would like to know why.
Probably a lot of people diagnosed with other diseases actually have Lyme. I have a friend who was diagnosed with MS for a few years before her doctor figured out she actually has Lyme.
Here's a bit of epidemiology and some more about the controversy from WikiPedia:
Epidemiology
Lyme disease is the most common tick-borne disease in North America and Europe and one of the fastest-growing infectious diseases in the United States. Of cases reported to the United States CDC, the ratio of Lyme disease infection is 7.9 cases for every 100,000 persons. In the ten states where Lyme disease is most common, the average was 31.6 cases for every 100,000 persons for the year 2005.[110]
Although Lyme disease has been reported in 49 of 50 states in the U.S, about 99% of all reported cases are confined to just five geographic areas (New England, Mid-Atlantic, East-North Central, South Atlantic, and West North-Central).[111] New 2008 CDC Lyme case definition guidelines are used to determine confirmed CDC surveillance cases.[112] Effective January 2008, the CDC gives equal weight to laboratory evidence from 1) a positive culture for B. burgdorferi; 2) two-tier testing (ELISA screening and Western Blot confirming); or 3) single-tier IgG (old infection) Western Blot. Previously, the CDC only included laboratory evidence based on (1) and (2) in their surveillance case definition. The case definition now includes the use of Western Blot without prior ELISA screen.
The number of reported cases of the disease have been increasing, as are endemic regions in North America. For example, it had previously been thought that B. burgdorferi sensu lato was hindered in its ability to be maintained in an enzootic cycle in California because it was assumed the large lizard population would dilute the prevalence of B. burgdorferi in local tick populations, but this has since been brought into question as some evidence has suggested that lizards can become infected.[113] Except for one study in Europe,[114] much of the data implicating lizards is based on DNA detection of the spirochete and has not demonstrated that lizards are able to infect ticks feeding upon them.[115][116][117][118] As some experiments suggest lizards are refractory to infection with Borrelia, it appears likely their involvement in the enzootic cycle is more complex and species-specific.[38]
While B. burgdorferi is most associated with ticks hosted by white-tailed deer and white-footed mice, Borrelia afzelii is most frequently detected in rodent-feeding vector ticks, Borrelia garinii and Borrelia valaisiana appear to be associated with birds. Both rodents and birds are competent reservoir hosts for B. burgdorferi sensu stricto. The resistance of a genospecies of Lyme disease spirochetes to the bacteriolytic activities of the alternative complement pathway of various host species may determine its reservoir host association.
In Europe, cases of B. burgdorferi sensu lato infected ticks are found predominantly in Norway, Netherlands, Germany, France, Italy, Slovenia and Poland, but have been isolated in almost every country on the continent.[119]
B. burgdorferi sensu lato infested ticks are being found more frequently in Japan, as well as in Northwest China and far eastern Russia.[120][121] Borrelia has been isolated in Mongolia as well.[122]
In South America tick-borne disease recognition and occurrence is rising. Ticks carrying B. burgdorferi sensu lato, as well as canine and human tick-borne disease, have been reported widely in Brazil, but the subspecies of Borrelia has not yet been defined.[123] The first reported case of Lyme disease in Brazil was made in 1993 in Sao Paulo.[124] B. burgdorferi sensu stricto antigens in patients have been identified in Colombia and Bolivia.
In Northern Africa B. burgdorferi sensu lato has been identified in Morocco, Algeria, Egypt and Tunisia.[125][126][127]
Lyme disease in sub-Saharan is presently unknown, but evidence indicates that Lyme disease may occur in humans in this region. The abundance of hosts and tick vectors would favor the establishment of Lyme infection in Africa.[128] In East Africa, two cases of Lyme disease have been reported in Kenya.[129]
In Australia there is no definitive evidence for the existence of B. burgdorferi or for any other tick-borne spirochete that may be responsible for a local syndrome being reported as Lyme disease.[130] Cases of neuroborreliosis have been documented in Australia but are often ascribed to travel to other continents. The existence of Lyme disease in Australia is controversial.
Northern hemisphere temperate regions are most endemic for Lyme disease.[131][132]
[edit]Controversy and politics
While there is general agreement on the optimal treatment of early Lyme disease, considerable controversy has attached to the existence, prevalence, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of "chronic" Lyme disease.[133] The popularity of "chronic Lyme disease" as a concept despite a lack of supporting medical evidence led to a 2008 New England Journal of Medicine article calling it "the latest in a series of syndromes that have been postulated in an attempt to attribute medically unexplained symptoms to particular infections."[10] Most medical authorities, including the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the American Academy of Neurology, and the Centers for Disease Control, do not recommend long-term antibiotic treatment for "chronic" Lyme disease, since trials have shown little or no benefit and considerable risk from long-term antibiotics, especially when given intravenously.
Groups of patients, patient advocates, and physicians who support the concept of chronic Lyme disease have organized to lobby for recognition of the disease, as well as insurance coverage of long-term antibiotic therapy, which most insurers deny as it is at odds with guidelines released by major medical organizations.[134] As part of this controversy, Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, whose decade-long ties to chronic Lyme advocacy groups[134] had prompted the rebuke of medical experts,[135] opened an antitrust investigation against the IDSA, accusing the IDSA panel of undisclosed conflicts of interest and of unduly dismissing alternative therapies. This investigation was closed on May 1, 2008 without charges after the IDSA agreed to a review of its guidelines by a panel of independent scientists and physicians.[136] Blumenthal's corresponding press release argued that the agreement vindicated his investigation and again alleged conflicts of interest.[137] A journalist writing in Nature Medicine[133] later wrote that some IDSA members may not have disclosed potential conflicts of interest. The IDSA's press release focused on the fact that the medical validity of the IDSA guidelines was not challenged.[138] Paul G. Auwaerter, director of infectious disease at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, cited this political controversy as an example of the "poisonous atmosphere" surrounding Lyme disease research which has led younger researchers to avoid the field.[136]
In 2001, the New York Times Magazine reported that Allen Steere, chief of immunology and rheumatology at New England Medical Center and a leading expert on Lyme disease, had been harassed, stalked, and threatened by patients and patient advocacy groups angry at his refusal to substantiate their diagnoses of "chronic" Lyme disease and endorse long-term antibiotic therapy.[139] Because of death threats, security guards were assigned to Steere.[76]
A significant amount of inaccurate information on Lyme disease exists on the Internet. A 2004 study found that 9 of 19 websites surveyed contained major inaccuracies. Sites found to be good sources of accurate information in this study included those of the American College of Physicians, the Centers for Disease Control, the Food and Drug Administration, and Johns Hopkins University (www.hopkins-arthritis.org).[140]
Gimpy-a-gogo2008-12-08 19:32:13That Gimp is a character Babs..she said you insulted her and then goes on to say you were not working with a full brain
She is and always will be Queen of rude!!!
Babs, your late nite look LOLmabus, I was simply confirming what Babs herself said: that she was working and replied with only half a brain. And you should talk, mabus; ou called me a moron recently.
And Babs, he compared Lyme to Syphilis because they're both caused by spirochette bacteria. I realise thast may not seem relevent to you, but to a biological scientist that might suggest that they, I dunoo, uh....HAVE SOME THINGS IN COMMON.
You guys just post to argue.
Gimpy-a-gogo2008-12-08 19:39:04when, need some glasses???http://www.lyme.org/otherdis/ld_history.html
It is a popular misconception that Lyme disease was discovered in the late 1970's in Lyme, Connecticut. However, medical literature is actually rich with more than a century of writing about the condition, although most of it has been published only in Europe. continued on link
OR if you are a believer of the Plumb Island propaganda conspiracy theory:
and this just out (not even in theatres yet!!
[QUOTE=mabus] when, need some glasses???[/QUOTE]
Here:
http://www.arthritisinsight.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=19590&PN=5
3rd post downBabs, thanks for the info...now I know it's possible that
we all have Lyme disease.
No wonder AP works so well on so many people! you are reaching,,,where is your name stated?
Let me break it down for you, anybody that says AP CURES and give up all your conventional meds but hey since you are part of the Holy Trinity, stand alone on your AP....sans MTX & Plaq
kinda like walk the walk
Saw a good show on Mystery ER , it was about Morgellons, and Lyme. One womans experience. It was different anyway. Some stuff i had never heard before. Well at least i know i do not have Morgellons. Poor lady she was miserable.mabus, For one thing, when you are replying to my post and you end your reply with "MORON!" who am I supposed to assume that's directed at. You do have basic communication skills, right?
Secondly, I know you have this whole Holy trinity thing in your head where you think Pip, JSNM, and I are all one person, but you really need to let go of that.I have never claimed that AP cures anything, or that it has a better success rate than other treatments (although I personally believe it does, I have never, ever claimed that). I have only ever claimed the same success rate that the studies show, since APers are constantly called to task on this forum for their medical choices.
My medical team and I have a treatment plan, and for you to suggest that I should alter it because of your misplaced and useless hostility towards some people's medical choices is completely ludicrous. My treatment plan is working for me. I have slowly reduced my mtx from 20mg to 5mg, while not suffering any major herxheimer reactions and doing better than I ever did before adding Minocin to my treatment. I make my medical decisions based on my needs and I don't have to prove a damn thing to you.you are a kick, why are you so into belittling people and all the poop about misplaced and useless hostility ..would that apply to you and LEV?????
you talk out of both ends, give it a break!!!
??????????
Whatevahyou always call people out on behavior in which you have
Whatever
Actually, Anna, since we've posted multiple times that Lyme has been found in all states as of 2008 (and your map stopped at 1996) and because you can't remember that fact and because your memory is so poor, maybe you have Alzheimers and therefore you have Lyme and you should be tested. Please remember IgeneX or MDL Labs.
Babs -
Some Lymies think Lyme is an STD and can be passed on from mother to child. So, yes, some believe mothers pass it on to their children. Lyme is called the "Great Imitator" so some get RA, some could get Alzheimers (according to this guy) some could get neuro involvement (ie Amy Tan).
And at least one guy out there is convined it's a genetically modifed bug made by our military. I kept the research and filed it under conspiracy.
Yes, you'd get tested (by Igenex or MDLabs) who look for genetic dna from the buggers. If you have it, or past exposure from it, you should test postitive for it. Both my hubby and myself (retest) will be getting the tests in January especially since he's shown up recently with a positive CCP.
Will you get cured with antibiotics after 40 years - probably not. But it will definitely help contain it. This is what I keep drumming into people - if it is an infection and you immunosuppress - what do you think is going to happen to the reactivated Lforms (or borie-whatzit)?.
Get tested and see what you're dealing with. If nothing...hey...at least you know you're safe.
Pip
[QUOTE=babs10]
ETA: I dont understand why everyone posts why they edited???
[/QUOTE]
Because some people here edit offensive/incendiary things and remain looking like the princess of sweetness and light. The rest of us note exactly what was edited so whole swaths of text doesn't disappear.
I've read that it was created during WW2 as bio warfare.... that's a bit far fetched on the conspiracy theory for me..
if it IS an infection and you immunosuppress - what about those that do immunosuppress and find themselves in remission? Are you saying they are wrong? and it's not so? and that when they stop the suppression they will have a huge reactivation?
Lymenet.org is a good site that covers most of the subjects here.Here is the CDC information site, much more recent. 93% of all lyme occurs in 10 states. Its amazing that people would rather believe a single person than science, real science.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5710a1.htm
Hope this is recent enough for you,
Please people get information from valid websites, like CDC, Mayo etc instead of assuming some people have "special" knowledge. Please note, I did not call anyone stupid or senile, I just produced facts.
[QUOTE=Gimpy-a-gogo]
And Babs, explain to me how someone with Lyme disease, rather than passing the infection on to their offspring, have descendent that instead get RA, rather than Lyme? How does this one completely different disease (in your "belief") somehow morph into a different disease?
[/QUOTE]
Babs may be more right than she realizes:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/08/030801081754.htm...
"Our data suggest these changes occur early in embryonic
development, before one would even be aware of the pregnancy," said
Jirtle. "Any environmental condition that impacts these windows in
early development can result in developmental changes that are
life-long, some of them beneficial and others detrimental."
If such epigenetic alterations occur in the developing sperm or
eggs, they could even be passed on to the next generation, potentially
becoming a permanent change in the family line, added Jirtle. In fact,
data gathered by Swedish researcher Gunnar Kaati and colleagues
indicates just such a multi-generational effect. In that study of
nutrition in the late 1800s, boys who reached adolescence (when sperm
are reaching maturity) during years of bountiful crop yield produced a
lineage of grandchildren with a significantly higher rate of diabetes.
No cause-and-effect link was established, but Jirtle suspects
epigenetic alterations could underlie this observation."
...
[QUOTE=JasmineRain] [QUOTE=Gimpy-a-gogo]
And Babs, explain to me how someone with Lyme disease, rather than passing the infection on to their offspring, have descendent that instead get RA, rather than Lyme? How does this one completely different disease (in your "belief") somehow morph into a different disease?
[/QUOTE]
Babs may be more right than she realizes:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/08/030801081754.htm[/QUOTE]
whaddya know... and I was half asleep using half my brain too!!!
...
"Our data suggest these changes occur early in embryonic development, before one would even be aware of the pregnancy," said Jirtle. "Any environmental condition that impacts these windows in early development can result in developmental changes that are life-long, some of them beneficial and others detrimental."
If such epigenetic alterations occur in the developing sperm or eggs, they could even be passed on to the next generation, potentially becoming a permanent change in the family line, added Jirtle. In fact, data gathered by Swedish researcher Gunnar Kaati and colleagues indicates just such a multi-generational effect. In that study of nutrition in the late 1800s, boys who reached adolescence (when sperm are reaching maturity) during years of bountiful crop yield produced a lineage of grandchildren with a significantly higher rate of diabetes. No cause-and-effect link was established, but Jirtle suspects epigenetic alterations could underlie this observation."
...
[/QUOTE]
Isn't it amazing what you can learn from science............
Lynn492008-12-09 07:42:49 [QUOTE=Bird Girrl] Here is the CDC information site, much more recent. 93% of all lyme occurs in 10 states. Its amazing that people would rather believe a single person than science, real science.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5710a1.htm
Hope this is recent enough for you,
Please people get information from valid websites, like CDC, Mayo etc instead of assuming some people have "special" knowledge. Please note, I did not call anyone stupid or senile, I just produced facts.[/QUOTE]
That site says Lyme appeared in 1971. So is it really that reliable?
As for epigenetic change, while it's possible, it certainly violates the principle of Occam's Razor, especially in the case of Lyme which is a known infection. [QUOTE=Gimpy-a-gogo] [
That site says Lyme appeared in 1971. So is it really that reliable?
As for epigenetic change, while it's possible, it certainly violates the principle of Occam's Razor, especially in the case of Lyme which is a known infection. [/QUOTE]
you tell us.....
didn't you say that it was the 70's til I showed you otherwise????
No, I said I didn't know why you said the 1880's, and then when you showed me the sites I accepted the information.
Brrd Grrl clings on to all misinformation, no matter how many times she's shown reliable refutation.
Chip on your shoulder?[QUOTE=Gimpy-a-gogo]cah, I haven't seen the movie myself but I have read quite a bit about Lyme and the medical controversy around it, so I'm keeping my eyes open for a screening near me. (I'm not sure why Babs thinks Lyme has been documented as far back as the 1880's,
since I was under the impression it was discovered in the 1970's.) [QUOTE]
SURE.. sure, Gimpy... that's the ticket.. yah..........
babs102008-12-09 10:45:10 [QUOTE=babs10] [QUOTE=Gimpy-a-gogo]cah, I haven't seen the movie myself but I have read quite a bit about Lyme and the medical controversy around it, so I'm keeping my eyes open for a screening near me. (I'm not sure why Babs thinks Lyme has been documented as far back as the 1880's,
since I was under the impression it was discovered in the 1970's.) [QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]
That's right. I said "I'm not sure why Babs thinks Lyme has been documented as far back as the 1880's, [COLOR=#cc0000]since I was under the impression it was discovered in the 1970's"
I didn't know why, then when you showed me why I changed my impression, I didn't stubbornly cling on to my misinformation for the rest of eternity.I mean, maybe I was getting my information from the Centre for Disease Control webste. You have to know there's a lot of obfuscation around Lyme disease these days
So what is your issue here?
there sure is a lot of obfuscation in all the aspects of this disease! and medicine in general!!Yes i think i am a genetic morh. Because no one in my family history has this misery that i have. Well i have several syblings with fibro dx. Maybe someone had it and didn't say. Or maybe they didn't have it very bad.
Of course that is just my opinion of the day. My imagination can go of course wild trying to figure this out. I am really not that concerned with where it came from at this point in time.
I am just concerened about gettting it under control. Even better if someone thinks of a way to get rid of it. Then we could all meet some where and have a drink and a good laugh . I will see you then.
[QUOTE=Gimpy-a-gogo]
Brrd Grrl clings on to all misinformation, no matter how many times she's shown reliable refutation.
Chip on your shoulder?[/QUOTE]
Excuse me, she asked for a more recent map than the 90's, I produced a map and information dated, 2007 and 2008. I am refuting your information and so I think it is you that clings to misinformation, no matter how many times you are show reliable refutation.
CDC keeps tracks of all diseases that can be transmitted. That is their job. If you don't think that is reliable information, that is your problem.
Remember, 93% of Lyme is in 10 states. The tick doesn't fly and only travels by climbing on animals or crawling. Since it is very tiny, crawling doesn't take it far. Since there are many barriers in the US, like cities, highways, rivers it will spread very slowly.The CDC has set up Lyme disease testing to FAIL. There standards are sub pare to say the least. What they require on a Western Blot is absurd. They have not changed since 1993
Copyright ArthritisInsight.com