Medical Hexing | Arthritis Information

Share
 

I think this is something that needs to be discussed.  I cannot tell you the number of docs I've seen that say 'that won't work' or 'you are only going to get worse'.  This is what drives me absolutely crazy about the 'acceptance' of having a chronic disease.

 
Never, ever give up - it's appalling to me how many docs have no hope and pass that crap on to us.
 
Pip
 
http://books.google.com/books?id=zpjfPgkTY94C&pg=PA74&lpg=PA74&dq=%22medical+hexing%22&source=bl&ots=lU7o2zrkJL&sig=lX4VfvhFHxgPDHYSgtcm-XxiAtI&hl=en&ei=HOKqSc7YEJ6DtwevotjXDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=2&ct=result#PPA76,M1
Pip, I have not taken time to read this, but just wanted to tell you that it's great to see you posting. Anyone read the book?  Dr. Weil is one of my favorite physicians.  Also, Pip because one accepts having the disease doesn't mean one gives up.  That's been explained time and time again.  Several of us on the forum have accepted the challenges of living our life with RA/Psa or any of their cousin diseases but we still seek clinical remission, a cure, etc. and have treatment goals.  Acceptance and being grounded helps us deal with the stress of the diseases.   Our treatments are by alopathic or complementary means or a combination of the two.  Once I get back to the states next month I'll pick up the book.  I swear by Dr. Weil's anti-inflammation diet.  Lindy 

Hi GG!  Thanks sweetie!  I've been in Girl Scout Cookie hell - we picked up part of her order and have 250 boxes to deliver this week.  The rest (467 boxes) come in next weekend.  And Spring Training just started.  Hubby and I took her to the park and taught her how to hit the ball today.  Then he batted the ball at her and she was supposed to catch it - instead he was purposely hit or threw it so it went over her head to me!!!  I keep telling him its not my job to shag flies!

Hey Lindy!  I'm actually reading it right now.  I googled his 'medical hexing' and found a link to the part of the book I found most interesting.  I think it ties in to a lot of what we deal with.  He talks about how most people are conditioned to believe that there is no 'cure' by things their doctors say and they lose hope of a cure.  He doesn't even like the word remission because he says that assumes the body can't cure it and sets us up for the disease to re-emerge.  I'm thinking I'm agreeing with him.  I got very angry with my docs when they said RA and refused to believe them.  Recently, I saw my AP doc and he made some comment about how we shouldn't go off the Mino because its harder to contain the second time around and I remember thinking "he doesn't think I should try to".  It took me a couple of days to wrap my head around, and while I really love these guys, I know in my heart he's wrong and I am going to go med free. 

I don't like everything this doc says in the book - there's a passage about how 4 diseases were thought to be psychosomatic (bronchial asthma, RA, peptic ulcers and Ulcerative Colitis) and by today (1995) it's down to 2 - RA and asthma.  And he's not saying ANYTHING about microbes - egads! - but, I do think he's right in a lot of what he says about the mind body connection.  Heck, he even mentions PNI.  I LOVE PNI.
 
Hugs,
 
Pip
PS - see, I know I'm the odd man out on this one too, but I don't think we should ever limit ourselves.  Acceptance is overrated IMHO.
 
 
Edited to correct harded to harder.
Pip!2009-03-01 20:16:13I'm w/ LinB on the acceptance part.. I joke about it being the elephant in the room.. but I know the thing is there.
 
We must know our enemy to fight it.. we do battle best against things we know....
 
 
Pip, Acceptance is overrated to you, but to the people on the forum who have decided to take this route it's far from overrated.   Being patient and accepting the disease process has led me to clinical remission - how overrated is that?  If there were a cure I'd fight just as hard for the cure as I have for remission. The mind/body connection is a theory that's been around forever, nothing new, just a few different twists on an old subject.  It helps some and not others.   Anytime we're focused, grounded and our spirit is stress free then the disease is going to be better controlled.   LindyGosh golly gee pip your so smart and inspirational!


NOT
I don't know where these people find all of these ragged doctors. It seems to me that those that doctor shop until they find a doctor that will tell them what they want to hear, prescribe what they want the doctor to prescribe are the most sick and confused and don't know what disease(s) they have. I have never had a doctor tell me that I am going to get worse. Where do they find their doctors? Even when I thought I was in "good" shape with the enbrel, mtx, prednisone coctail, my doctors thought that I could and should be better and prescribed rituxin infusions. Never did any one of them tell me I was going to get worse. Of course I never told them that they were stupid and that I was smarter and more knowledgable than they. This theory of healing thyself is a good concept until a person gets a disease like rheumatoid arthritis or any other chronic disease. I lived for some 54 years healing myself. After all, I never got a bad disease. It's stupid to read a book from someone without our disease and that ignorant person telling us to heal ourselves. When that author gets a chronic disease, he'll better understand our situation. A person without our disease, rheumatoid arthritis, trying to tell us what we should do about our disease, rheumatoid arthritis, is really just an ra ignorant visitor to this forum, no offense. There is no debate, it's just that simple. Mind over matter? Mind over disease? First start with spoon bending, see how that goes. A good attitude with ra is a good thing but it won't cure the disease. There are a hundred things connected with ra that fights against our "good" attitude. A person that doesn't have our disease cannot understand that. It's just that simple, and that's pretty simple stuff. Talk is so cheap especially when it's from a cheap talker. People that believe that they are smarter than the doctors and scientists are not just confused, they're egotistical idiots, no offense.

LEV
[QUOTE=LinB]Anyone read the book?  Dr. Weil is one of my favorite physicians. [/quote]
I have read the book a couple of times. Like much that Dr. Weil writes, it takes a modicum of discernment and scrutiny to separate the useful from the woo-woo. As is mentioned later in this thread, the body-mind-spirit connection is, at least for me, an important aspect of treatment...any treatment.
 [quote]... because one accepts having the disease doesn't mean one gives up. [/quote]
In my case acceptance has pushed me to examine every treatment seeking a penultimate clinical remission and ultimate healing. I have reached remission, albeit with medication, on more than one occasion. The last full-blown remission was from mid-1999 through March of 2007 when a compound fracture of my forearm/wrist with subsequent surgeries brought on a flare and ended my clinical remission. Just because I have accepted this set-back does not mean I have stopped seeking clinical remission and cure.

I have three physicians who work closely together with me and with each other and none of us are afraid of taking a calculated leap of faith. Complementary therapies are included in my treatment plan, including some that Dr. Weil recommends.

If you have an opportunity to attend a workshop with Dr. Weill, do so! He is a dynamic, informative, and amusing presenter. I have this book.  PIP, I agree you should stay optimistic.  and not follow the doom and gloom of having a disease. easier said than done on flare days.  I think when we are flaring we say a lot of things we later wish we could recant and that is what people are reacting to the things when say at that moment when they say oh just accept it already or at least that is how it sounds.  I don't think you would be seeking help for yourself if you had not accepted it or would not have joined an RA group if you had not accepted there is a problem with your health.  it's kind of like preaching to the choir.  You are doing everything to help your body heal itself. 
One board member from another site once said "I don't think my body has RA from a lack of toxic chemicals."  She controls her RA with diet. Has she not accepted her RA?  I think she has and choosing the treatment plan she can live with.  We are free to choose.  I don't know her particular situation. how bad her RA but she feels she has cured herself through diet and has a web site describing her RA journey.  Her name is Susan Dorey.  Not sure if I can post her web site here but I have it if you want it.  but I feel she is optimistic about her health and doesn't listen to the gloom of the docs.
And sometimes I wonder if we are not all saying the same things but expressing it differently.
Just do what you think is right for you. 
I hope the best for all of you and me included.
take care. 
Lin -
 
I don't think we're using 'acceptance' in the same way as I don't think, from what you've described, as you having accepted this disease at all - you've actively fought and got remission as a reward.
 
Aguaeon -
 
I think you're saying what I'm saying - 'remission' is a step on the road to a cure.  If we, or our doctors think, that a cure is not possible, then they can consciously (or unconsciously) influence our healing process.  I wasn't kidding when I said it took me a couple of days to wrap my head around what my AP doc said.  This is the same man that told me 10% of his patients go med free - so why in the hell would I ever think I'm not going to be in that group.  THAT'S the club I want to join.
 
Hugs,
 
Pip
PS - has anybody been told something by their doc that was WRONG and that they proved to be wrong?  This is the point of this doctors belief in 'medical hexing' - in that things the docs say and don't say influence how we heal - he thinks they need classes to teach them how to talk to patients. LOL
Yes, Shelly, I think we're saying the same thing!I don't get the sense PIP has not accepted she has RA. I do get maybe her perception of acceptance is different than those here and that words means different things for different people. 
Also, believe it or not there are doom and gloom docs out there I have met a couple of them.  Very smart ones. Just very bad bedside manners and will give you the worse case scenario.  Many of them stop me from taking the supplements like MSM even the good ones, or suggest that I do and I do.  To PIP it means just give up. that is why I like to add don't stop looking until you find a therapy that works for you and you obviously have accepted you have RA because you are seeking help for it. now the patience part is separate and it varies from personality to personality. 
I have experienced the care of a couple of good doctors so I have something to compare it to. where I am not the only one willing to keep searching but the doc is too.  Two docs ago. I would go into the office in excruiciating pain, swollen all over, the RA out of control.  The doc and his assistants would be so focused on my coumadin and PT levels they would say things like oh well that comes with the territory when it came to the RA. I felt they were not listening.  I would be near tears. It got to every time they put me on mtx my liver enzymes went up and they would stop it rather than lowering the dose. then start me again only to stop it again. they put me on orencia only to stop it because it was making me worse. by then I was insisting on mtx regardless of the elevated liver enzymes. the pain was unbearable.  but there was nothing else they could do. I would ask them if they wanted to give arava another chance or something else from the past that had been tried. I was in agony, not denial and had run out of options. until rituxan was mentioned. it was brand new. a doctor where I worked would not prescribe it.  spoke against and said it was dangerous, too many side effects.  I could have gone home and given up sat in a wheelchair which is what PT suggested that I got I wheelchair.  I didn't.  I continue to seek a remission which has always been my goal and a doctor who doesn't just writes what the prescription I want but who listens and with the new doc I went onto the rituxan.  that is another individual thing. we all want different things from our doctors. each RA case is so different you have to be able to listen to the symptoms.
So since I am not you and you are not me. I like to tell people to do what feels right for them.
but at the same time tell them what worked for me and the experiences behind it.  It is the way I learn. I have to see the whole picture, not bits and pieces so it is the way I teach the whole picture then zoom in for details.
 
[QUOTE=Pip!] [/QUOTE]
 
What diet ??? which book is it in ???
http://www.drweil.com/drw/u/ART02012/anti-inflammatory-diet What I don't get is why Pip's personal opinion and stance about her own convictions are not accepted as her reality, and instead becomes the opportunity for a bunch of nasty badmouthing.  If you truly believe in acceptance, you would accept her version of her reality, keep your own, and move on.  But, I guess we have to endure and accept nastiness in here, which really is a pity for grown adults.  I don't think you were being nasty, snow.
Snowie, you don't have a nasty bone in your body :)  My favorite phrase "Perception is reality, and its all an illusion".  LOLBig difference between a civil debate and uncalled for nastiness.  [QUOTE=justsaynoemore]What I don't get is why Pip's personal opinion and stance about her own convictions are not accepted as her reality, and instead becomes the opportunity for a bunch of nasty badmouthing.  If you truly believe in acceptance, you would accept her version of her reality, keep your own, and move on.  But, I guess we have to endure and accept nastiness in here, which really is a pity for grown adults.  [/QUOTE]

Nasty badmouthing? OK, I has assumed, with all its implications, that this was a discussion open to all opinions. I see now that I was obviously mistaken and I stand corrected. Note to self...no opinions that run contrary to the original poster.
PIP,
Now that you have elaborated a bit more I feel I have a better understanding. 
I love Dr. Weil and think he is a very smart man, harvard trained physician. I used to go to his web site often asking about different herbal remedies and RA relief.  I have several of his books and one being spontaneous healing. I didn't remember the part about him saying not to use the word remision. However, I don't doubt it.  I do however, remember he was very much into your mindset.  Mind over matter kind of thing and back then I went to a hypnotist (sp) because I just really didn't think I could quiet the mind long enough for mind over matter.  Also purchased a few meditation CDs.  I got a cancer scare after all that too and started doing imagery and visualization for the possible cancer and RA.  So I really get that.  I think acceptance or denial should be thrown out the window in your case and that it fits more under alternative therapy but then again it could benefit us all to have the mind over matter attitude. although the first 2 years of the disease, I was in total denial and didn't have time to be sick.  I had a sick child to care for.  I took the NSAids they gave me all the while waiting for this monster to just disappear. An ER doc told me it could be a virus that imitates RA for 2 years but she didn't think so -- so for those 2 years that's what I hoped for a virus that would go away. when it didn't disappear I had to find a way to fight it and I fought hard because then it became a race against time to save my joints all the while hoping for the spontaneous healing talked about because some people do spontaneously go into remission on the traditional meds, and now these days, it is to hold on to what little independence and dignity I have left since so many of the joints have been taken from me one by one and mobility is severely limited.
Suzanne Somers comes to mind and another web site drday.com comes to mind.  I used to visit her web site as well.  she is a lot like Dr. Weil.  And certain religions believe this way as well. I used to post on the road back.org web site often years ago when I was doing the abc (antibiotic) protocol.  A lot of people said they were helped by it.  I believed them.  I tried it. It didn't help me but none of the traditional meds have either for very long so...
Still practice mind over matter though. but have chosen the traditional meds point of view with the concept of no cure for RA and going into remission but totally get where you are coming from and since no one has any real answers in my opinion, I try to keep an open mind about those not-so-traditional ways may work or make getting through the day without the assistance of another person, and simple things like being able to bathe myself or cook for myself or go to the bathroom on my own, possible.
I wish you healing soon on whatever path of therapy you choose. 
 
Shelly632009-03-02 20:11:34 [QUOTE=justsaynoemore]What I don't get is why Pip's personal opinion and stance about her own convictions are not accepted as her reality, and instead becomes the opportunity for a bunch of nasty badmouthing.  If you truly believe in acceptance, you would accept her version of her reality, keep your own, and move on.  But, I guess we have to endure and accept nastiness in here, which really is a pity for grown adults.  [/QUOTE]

Cathy, I just reread this entire post and, with a couple of exceptions, I thought it was a great discussion.  I was happy to see Pip post and thought she brought a great topic to the table.  I applaud the majority of posters we have here on this board (and on this post).  I strongly value the variety of opinions and am glad we don't all think alike.

I sincerely hope my post was not taken as nastiness or sarcasm.
waddie, it was the couple of exceptions, you know I admire you and your posts :)
 
agueon:  you assume and are way off the mark.  Civil debate is welcome anywhere, its the spice of life!  I was specifically referring to the very obvious posts that ripped a fellow poster who starts a new topic, cites a source, and states an opinion, and instead of adult, civil debate, they use is as their personal fodder so the tiresome flaming lurkers in here can pounce and belittle and make fools of themselves, but that's just something I guess I have to accept, as they do have the right to be fools :) 
justsaynoemore2009-03-03 04:39:15JSNM, you can say his name... you just can't say it three times or he  may appear!!    (sorry, I couldn't resist! )
 
I think we are all pretty certain that our opinions.. no matter who we are.. will meet w/ discention somewhere down the road........ yet, by chosing to put them out there.. we may inform or help someone else..
 
I certainly don't agree w/ alot of what Pip! says about treatments etc and I'm sure she doesn't agree w/ mine.. but she sure has a right to say it.. and we have a right to read it, respond to it.. or ignore...... 
 
I know you're just being the good friend you are.
I hope I am actually speaking for alot of us who are tired of this childish behavior - and its not just one poster, its gang mentality.  Post your opinion, but don't belittle or trash the poster, just ignore it, or be evener smarter and don't post - this goes across the board for me, and I hope for others in here.  I call it being respectful of others' opinions, without being nasty.  It's come down to this as we have to police this board in order not to run off newcomers. 
 
I think my 23 years of 12-step programs is what influences me on this point.  In AA, even a drunk is welcome LOL.  Everyone has their chance to share, and since your disease is yours, you don't belittle another fellow sufferer as you have no idea what someone else disease is doing to them, not their past or future.  You concentrate on your own recovery, and take what you need, and left the rest behind. 
 
I am a good friend.  And I hope I am being a good friend for putting myself out there once again defending any poster who is subjected to bad manners. 
You're a sweetie, Cathy, and yes, they're rude, but maybe they'll just go away....one can only hope.
 
I just think it's interesting, what with the advances in PNI (Psychoneuroimmunology) that at least one doc says that we're bound for failure because of how docs talk to us.  He used examples to one UC guy that 'you're going to get cancer anyway' and and another doc who told his MS patient to get a wheelchair and 'practice one hour a day' for when you can't walk.  It's not that different from some of the stories we've seen here on AI.  We watched Sicko last night for the first time and MM goes on about how American's are without hope from their doctors.
 
Pip
[QUOTE=justsaynoemore]agueon:  you assume and are way off the mark.  Civil debate is welcome anywhere...[/QUOTE]
Thanks for clearing that up. Yes, I had assumed that other opinions were OK. I now see the error of my ways. I thought that I was being civil, but can certainly accept that not everyone perceives intentions the same way.

As I feel very much like I have entered the theater in the middle of a movie and both context and subtext escapes me, I will follow the next bit of friendly advice
[QUOTE=Pip!]You're a sweetie, Cathy, and yes, they're rude, but maybe they'll just go away....one can only hope.[/quote]
Your hope is my command.

Damn, don't you just hate these obligatory big exit speeches?
[QUOTE=aguaeon] [QUOTE=justsaynoemore]agueon:  you assume and are way off the mark.  Civil debate is welcome anywhere...[/QUOTE]
Thanks for clearing that up. Yes, I had assumed that other opinions were OK. I now see the error of my ways. I thought that I was being civil, but can certainly accept that not everyone perceives intentions the same way.

As I feel very much like I have entered the theater in the middle of a movie and both context and subtext escapes me, I will follow the next bit of friendly advice
[QUOTE=Pip!]You're a sweetie, Cathy, and yes, they're rude, but maybe they'll just go away....one can only hope.[/quote]
Your hope is my command.

Damn, don't you just hate these obligatory big exit speeches?
[/QUOTE]

Please don't leave.  I enjoy your posts - even when I don't agree with you.[/QUOTE]
 
 
I'm in agreement with Jas...Don't go,  I enjoy your posts too!  Just ignore the rudeness.  That works for me Aguaeon -
 
Neither Cathy or I were referring to you.  I like a good debate!  It's sooooo much better than just going thru life with blinders, both figuratively as well as intellectually.  Yes, you came into a movie where the context and subtext are difficult to ascertain.  Think French New Wave Cinema.  LOL 
 
Pip
Pip, can I ask a question without getting slapped?  
PS - If you feel more comortable discussing via PM, just let me know!
[QUOTE=justsaynoemore]I hope I am actually speaking for alot of us who are tired of this childish behavior - and its not just one poster, its gang mentality.  Post your opinion, but don't belittle or trash the poster, just ignore it, or be evener smarter and don't post - this goes across the board for me, and I hope for others in here.  I call it being respectful of others' opinions, without being nasty.  It's come down to this as we have to police this board in order not to run off newcomers.  box . Then in the "Find Posts box" drop down box, click on "Last year" "And Newer" click on "Rheumatoid Arthritis" in the "Search Forum" box and click on "Start Search". Gang attacks indeed.

Again I say that I find it offensive for a any person that does not have Rheumatoid Arthritis  and is not a Rheumatoid Doctor to come to a Rheumatoid Arthritis forum and tell sufferers of Rheumatoid Arthritis how to cure their disease. Yous can attack me until the "cow" comes home. A person without rheumatoid arthritis cannot understand arthritis and the acceptance of the disease. For a person to suffer from a disease that may cause inflammation and pain in moments, here today maybe gone for a year, and not have to worry about the damages to joints and organs that rheumatoid arthritis causes, including death, those persons cannot associate themselves with the disease or sufferer in anyway. That statement cannot be debated with reason and intelligence. Because I continue to make that statement does not make it nasty. Honesty is not nasty. JSNM, I believe you were ready to hate Snowowl only because she made a statement close to one of my statements and you were ready to hate. I have never had a Doctor tell me that I was going to get worse. That's what Snowowl said and I don't think that's a reason to believe that she is a fan of mine and should be attacked. She was just telling the truth. Do the "moron" search. How can two people find so many "moron" doctors and "moron"health care professionals and other human beings that are all morons?  And how can they be so "nasty"?

This is what Pip said:

I think this is something that needs to be discussed.  I cannot tell you the number of docs I've seen that say 'that won't work' or 'you are only going to get worse'.  This is what drives me absolutely crazy about the 'acceptance' of having a chronic disease. LEVlevlarry2009-03-03 16:50:11You know its funny, I am still a member of another board and the same thing happens over there only they gang up on you if you mention anything that IS traditional and one of the reasons I no longer post often over there. I haven't had prolonged success with anything so I am really just believing all of you when you say you have been helped or have been in remission or try this or take this.  I have to just take you at your word and I don't have a problem with that. You have no reason to lie to me and who knows it might just work for me too. So keeping an open mind about things go a long way. 
I am just perplexed as to how this has turned into such a debate.  
it never ceases to amaze me how we can find anything under the sun to debate at the expense of others.  some things are just not up for debate like someone's personal choice for healthcare.  To each his own.  Now will get my very light sensitive blood shot red eyes off this internet. 
We love you PIP and we all support you in whatever works for you. 
 
 
I really can't for the life of my understand why we are nit picking at what a word means.
 
The word 'acceptance' ---
I accept the diagnosis, I just don't accept the rheumatologists views that there is virtually nothing I can do about it and it is all down hill from here.  So for those sceptics, what part of 'acceptance' in my case don't you like or agree with.
 
If I had listened and believed the rheumatologist who said your PRA may progress to RA and if it does etc etc -- if I just accepted 'my lot in life' I would be waiting to become wheelchair bound and in extreme pain for the rest of my life and in the meantime be treating a disease I don't have just in case I might get it.   
 
I have chosen to fight this, and it is my right will do so, how I choose to do this is my decision and I don't need anyone's permission to do so.   The fact is the treatment path I have chosen happens to be AP and in order to go down that path responsibly I need the help and assistance of a doctor, fortunately for me I have one.
 
Maz
ps - Welcome back Pip...
 
 
Maz-aust2009-03-03 17:33:17
Thanks Jasmine....
 
 
[QUOTE=JasmineRain]http://www.drweil.com/drw/u/ART02012/anti-inflammatory-diet [/QUOTE]
Thanks Larry for making my point, once again.  My reality is a wasteland of moronic doctors in Florida who have now either lost their license, gone out of business, gone bankrupt, or left the State.  This was when I first got sick and was trying to get diagnosed.  They are still morons.  I have had fantastic care in Alaska and Washington in the past, so I was bewildered by what happened.  And I can post articles from the local papers to back up my statements about the "patient dumping" that was occuring while I got progressively sicker, and received no help.  That's my truth, just like Pip's truths are true for her.  Belittling us really makes you look, well, moronic, and non-accepting of other's truths.
 
So, under your theory, I am not allowed to have my reality of my experience of what happened to me in my medical story.  Luckily, since finally being diagnosed almost 3 years ago I have slowly built a fantastic team around me of medical professionals I deeply respect, and have many posts to back that up.  But you chose to ignore that with your "straw man" argument, just cherry picking what you want to make your point.  Sad.  Unaccepting. 
 
And, I am still praying for you, twice a day now.  Take care ~~ Cathy
JSNM - I don't seem to have forgiven Chicken Lev enough to start praying for him but by your example I just might have to start.  Damn.
 
Hey Mel -
 
I don't need pain killers or the Naproxen anymore but my AP doc says I have to stay on the Naproxen until I hit remission.  Something about inflammation makes it harder to hit the mycoplasma - think of a force field with the little buggers hiding behind it.  Lessen the inflammation and the antibiotic can hit its target.  AP doesn't kill the myco - it disables a protein in it that allows the body to rid itself of it.  I think the reason it seems so if-fy is because so many docs tell us it doesn't work, or it works for mild, or, "I save that for my severe cases'.  Whatever you have, it doesn't work for that, only the opposite.
 
My whole point in this, which maybe I didn't make quite clear because I was trying to be sensitive to non-APers, is that I think this so called 'medical hexing' applies more to non-APers than to APers.  APers have already made the leap to 'non-mainstream medicine' so they already have the mindset that the medical establisment doesn't have what they want offered.  But I think the people in the mainstream are more effected by this negative thinking (altho I experienced this with my great AP doc).  Can you imagine a doc telling somebody they're going to get cancer?  I mean, we talk about the possiblities here amongst ourselves, BUT WE'RE NOT DOCS, so our opinions weigh less. 
 
I was told 'most medicines don't work for PRA' so was surprised to find out that they do - from other PRA peeps.  That doc gave me a pronouncement that I wasn't willing to accept.  His meds we're going to work for me anyway so I'd better find something else.  And when I did find something else (AP) he told me it wouldn't work for me, he'd prescribe it, but he wasn't willing to monitor me on it.  At that point I was still trying to do antivirals, which this doc knew, and was advocated for by an infectious disease doc I'd seen at the same U, but this doc, and my idiot GP/Family Med doc, refused to 1) tell me this doc agreed with me and 2) prescribe - instead they told my husband and I that I could have that if we worked my way thru all the medicines they had for 3 months each, and if after eight years I wasn't controlled, they'd consider antivirals.  I could have been cured if these BOZO's would have given me what 1) I'd asked for and 2) the infectious disease doc said to give me. 
 
I might still be a little angry - I just passed my anniversary on being diagnosed.
 
Pip
[QUOTE=Pip!]
My whole point in this, which maybe I didn't make quite clear because I was trying to be sensitive to non-APers, is that I think this so called 'medical hexing' applies more to non-APers than to APers.  APers have already made the leap to 'non-mainstream medicine' so they already have the mindset that the medical establisment doesn't have what they want offered.  But I think the people in the mainstream are more effected by this negative thinking (altho I experienced this with my great AP doc).  Pip
[/QUOTE]
 
Let me be very clear, my docs have always been positive concerning remission and RA.  And as the mom of a cancer patient, I've never experienced it in that venue either.......
 
In my experiences with the medical profession,  negative thinking by physicians has never been a problem.
I just realized that my 18 months under the rheumy who diagnosed me never said one word about cure, remission, outcome, hope, nothing at all.  Lynn, you just made me realize this, thanks.  Cathy[QUOTE=justsaynoemore]I just realized that my 18 months under the rheumy who diagnosed me never said one word about cure, remission, outcome, hope, nothing at all.  Lynn, you just made me realize this, thanks.  Cathy[/QUOTE]
 
In my opinion, if your RD isn't talking about "tight control" and remission, then you should be seeking another doc...
 
edited because I can't type and talk on the phone!
Lynn492009-03-04 05:27:16LOL - that's why I fired him.  His physical exam of my knees was through my clothing, and he squeezed my feet with shoes on.  LOL  Buh-bye, as I got a letter from him a year after I stopped seeing him, and he was leaving the State to go to NY, where he doesn't hold a medical license (I love the Internet).  But I start a new rheumatologist the end of this month, so I am cautiously hopeful.   I cannot type and talk on the phone at the same time, let alone drive too .... j/kPip. I think there is much to the mind body connection. I will read the article later when my life slows down a bit. I am RF positive but do not have RA. My daughter has a positive ANA and does not have lupus. My rheumy wants to test me for lupus as she thinks that is what I have. I cannot tell you what a diagnosis of RA did to my head over the past three years. Did it change me? Yep. Am I getting tested for Lupus? Nope. I have worked in a chronic disease unit for 20 years and have observed what a diagnosis does to people. I have heard doctors tell people there is no hope. I have sat with these people who are helpless and feel so hopeless. I have shed many tears with them. A diagnosis somehow changes things for people. It is almost like a chemical reaction occurs in some peoples brains.   Some people have the energy to fight and some don't. Some listen to and hang on to every word their doctor tells them and they resign themselves to that prognosis. Every time you see them, they are a little weaker and sicker. Finally, they die. They don't fight because they were told by someone there was no hope. It does not matter if it is cancer, RA, crohns, or whatever. It is all a disease process.

LinB I am glad that you have been able to fight through your disease and are now in remission. It is too bad that everyone cannot do the same. But many people do not have the means, either financial, emotional, or whatever to do this. Disease strips people of everything at times and you see it more and more with each admission. I'm sure you witnessed this as a nurse.

To all that posted. I read the thread until the first dagger was flung at Pip and then stopped. You took a subject that is so unbelievably interesting and pertinent to all of us and ruined a good thread. This is too bad. The really sad thing is, it is so relevant to your everyday life and you don't see it.Maz,

A couple of times now you have mentioned that your diagnoses was a wheelchair. Do you have another disease besides Palindromic Arthritis? Are there alot of Palindromic patients that end up in a wheelchair? That surprises me because unlike Rheumatoid Arthritis, Palindromic Arthritis causes no joint or bone damage. So where does the wheelchair come in at? With Rheumatoid Arthritis getting a good nights sleep can be a mission in itself. Lay on the left side and the pain in the left shoulder, left hip, left knee, left ankle and left 15 toe knuckles keeps an ra sufferer from a good nights sleep. When a Rheumatoid Arthritis sufferer lays on the right side, the pain in the right shoulder, the right hip, the right ankle, the 15 toe knuckles in the right foot and the right jawbone prevents a good nites sleep. Do you know what that's like? Can you "accept" that if you don't feel that? And all the while the "Rheumatoid" Arthritis is destroying the joints and bones, unlike your disease, "Palindromic" Arthritis that causes no bone or joint damage. Can you "accept" that? Can ya feel me sista? Of course you can't. You write about your pain in your ankle that you had to endure for the weekend. And just like that, two days and the pain is gone. That's how Palindromic works. When I read your post about your two day suffering with that swollen ankle, I was very fortunate to have just bought a new box of tissue. No offense. Can ya feel me sista? What percentage of Palindromic sufferers end up in a wheelchair because of that specific disease? A few times you have mentioned that you didn't want to take ra drugs that would "destroy" your immune system. Which drugs do that? I've heard of some that slow or alter the immune system but I haven't heard of those you speak of that "destroy" the immune system. None the less, people like you and Pip that don't have Rheumatoid Arthritis, have the luxury of trying anything you want. Yous have the luxury of not taking a medical experts advice. What's the worst that can happen? Every month or two, you get a flare in your ankle? Two days later it's gone. No damage done. That's not how it works with Rheumatoid Arthritis. As long as there is pain and inflamation, destruction is going on. Can ya feel me sistas. Of course you can't. You can't feel Rheumatoid Arthritis unless you have Rheumatoid Arthritis. And again, that is my debate and argument against people without Rheumatoid Arthritis, they can't feel me sista. They don't have the same life altering concerns that ra sufferers have to deal with. When a person with Rheumatoid Arthritis decides that they are smarter than the medical expert, that stupidity can cost an ra sufferer an arm and a leg in a very short period of time, literally. You and Pip don't have that concern. You do not have Rheumatoid Arthritis. Can ya feel me sistas. Boo-hoo to your two day swollen ankle. Boo-hoo to your come and go disease. I can feel ya sista. Only I can feel ya 24-7-365 multiplied by 10 joints. Here is what Rheumatoid Arthritis looks like. And hey, this isn't really all that bad. Many other have much worse:
http://www.kodakgallery.com/Slideshow.jsp?Uc=172ny0sz.rncpcyr&Uy=v28nv9&Upost_signin=Slideshow.jsp%3Fmode%3Dfromshare&Ux=0&UV=538888796634_72357283715&mode=fromshare&conn_speed=1

Once again I will say it. My offense is that people with-out Rheumatoid Arthritis cannot feel it, mentally or physically. Accept that. It can't be debated. That's just absolute fact. They don't have to worry about damage and life threatening problems associated with RA. People like Pip and you Maz only have to worry about your next two day flare that may not happen for another year. But why would anyone without RA feel that they are qualified in anyway to tell RA sufferers about RA, what they should accept, how they should feel and what medical path to choose? That's absurd. They can't feel it and they can't accept it. I know that the "group" will say I'm being "nasty". I am just stating facts. The truth seems to somehow annoy the group. The group wants a debate but only those agreeing with the group are allowed to debate or else the "group" grabs their AI forum badges and try to send those not agreeing and not kissing and hugging and bowing low enough, out of this forum.  And yes, justsaynoemore, I said a prayer for you. It was short and to the point.  My prayer concerning you? I prayed that you get what you deserve.

Lorster, seriously, you constantly talk about how bad the hospital and doctors are where you work. You constantly talk about the healthcare professionals at your hospital being wore out, overworked and stretched past safety. You tell everyone that the doctors there constantly overmedicate their patients and they have no concerns for the patients. Why don't you turn them in to the proper authorities. Certainly you will be a heroe, probably saving many lives. I couldn't sleep at night knowing that I was a part of such criminal activity. I hope you will consider turning these criminals in. And Lorster, the only "daggers" thrown were from your "group" members at those that had differing facts of the debate. I still find it strange that a few people without rheumatoid arthritis continue to post on a rheumatoid arthritis forum. I still believe that if a member without rheumatoid arthritis gives rheumatoid arthritis advice, they should make it perfectly clear that they do not have rheumatoid arthritis. I realize that they have over stayed their welcome at the palindromic forum and guess they are "homeless". I know that the "group" really don't like disagreements, too bad. I continue to take offense at people without rhumatoid arthritis trying to give rheumatoid advise. They don't have any idea what rheumatoid arthritis is and the problems, mentally and physically, that comes in the same suitcase. I know they are some of your dearest and closest friends, but they don't know it, they don't feel it, they don't have it and they just don't get it. Got it? Please Lorster, consider turning in those medical criminals that you work with. You and Pip and Justsaynoemore should get together and "out" all of the criminals and unqualifed healthcare professionals that yous talk about. Certainly they can't sue yous unless yous tell something that's not true, right? Name some names so that we can confront them. Put their personal medical information out here in the world wide web for all to see. Believe me, I will confront them with the medical malpractice accusations that yous post.

LEV


The above person gets my thanks for is long, rambling post.  He unwittingly proved my point.  I think this is the main problem between the AP and the non-AP people.  Something about this HOPE we have un-nerves some people.  The fact that some people can maintain their disease and get their lives back causes them to be unable to process information correctly because if we're right...and if this works...then what does that say about their choices?  So they blame the people who are succeeding instead of looking inside to find out where all that anger should be directed...possibly at the docs who took all their hope away?
 
Pip
who is succeeding??  I want to know.
Babs-
 
You might read the AP thread or check out the Road Back Bulletin Board.
[QUOTE=Pip!]The above person gets my thanks for is long, rambling post.  He unwittingly proved my point.  I think this is the main problem between the AP and the non-AP people.  Something about this HOPE we have un-nerves some people.  The fact that some people can maintain their disease and get their lives back causes them to be unable to process information correctly because if we're right...and if this works...then what does that say about their choices?  So they blame the people who are succeeding instead of looking inside to find out where all that anger should be directed...possibly at the docs who took all their hope away? Pip-
 
Well said!!!!
Pip,

Without offense, without anger you are one of the people that I am talking about. Look at your above statement. Anyone reading that would be interested in what that member Pip with Rheumatoid Arthritis is talking about being cured of Rheumatoid Arthritis. There-in lies the problem. You don't have Rheumatoid Arthritis and you aren't being cured of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Pure deceit. Because you feel that your medical path for your disease, Palindromic Arthritis is working for you does not mean that your medical path is right for people with a different disease like rheumatoid arthritis. If you actually had rheumatoid arthritis and the mental and physical challenges that come with the disease, your path would probably, very well be a different path and your whole outlook on the disease and challenges would be completely different. You can't associate with that or accept that because you don't have the worrys and challenges associated with rheumatoid arthritis. We with rheumatoid arthritis don't have to every month or two cry about a flare in one or two joints that lasts for up to two days. You with Palindromic Arthritis, can make your medical decisions without worry of joint or bone destruction. You can make your medical decisions with out consideration to inflammation of the heart, lungs and arteries that may very well lead to death. You and others with your disease don't have those problems or concerns as those of us with rheumatoid arthritis must mix all the other very serious concerns into our medical equations and decisions. You and others without our disease cannot understand that and apparently yous can't accept it either and that's your problem. You can't because it doesn't affect you, therefore it's not needed for your medical decisions to consider the life threatening and debillitating effects of rheumatoid arthritis. Those are not needed parts of your equation to your medical pathway decision. Now can you see that those of us with a life threatening disease cannot afford to be so loosey goosey with our medical decisions. We have a life threatening disease. You have a life annoying disease. And oh yeah Pip, I'm not the one that is saying that AP therapy is not very affective against Rheumatoid Arthritis, that's the American College of Rheumatology and I accept them to be the foremost in knowledge. I will continue to consider the American College of Rheumatology medical recomendations well above you and your small groups recomendations. It used to be that the American College of Rheumatology was your and your groups favorite choice of information when you used small snippets and outdated postings to advantage your agenda. Now that they have updated their recomendations for Rheumatoid Arthritis therapy and minocin is practically never recomended, all of a sudden the American College of Rheumatology is only used when you or one of your group sneeks in an outdated post from the ACR on the AP thread. That in itself is deceitful because you will not post the updated 2008 therapy recomendations for Rheumatoid Arthritis from the American College of Rheumatology because it doesn't fit your and your groups agenda. Please, show me where on the AP thread where you have posted the updated ACR recomendations. Deceitful. And Pip, I don't blame the people that are succeeding. I love to hear about the success stories here at AI. It affects me. I actually have Rheumtoid Arthritis. I don't try to sway people to a medical pathway using snippets and deceit. One more thing Pip. There is no problem between the AP and Non AP members. The problems were/are when false and misleading statments are made. Fortunately those false and misleading posts have just about stopped except on the AP thread, thanks to me showing the truths and the deceit and false posts for what they are, right? And yes, I don't expect you to say thanks for me showing the truth and proving the deceit. But at least it has been stopped.

LEV


[QUOTE=Pip!]The above person gets my thanks for is long, rambling post.  He unwittingly proved my point.  I think this is the main problem between the AP and the non-AP people.  Something about this HOPE we have un-nerves some people. 
 
Pip
[/QUOTE]
 
What problem between AP and Non AP?....huh? Sorry PIP...don't put me in any group. I know what I have ( RA) and I am being treated. I have hope. I am not hopeless at all.
I read Levs post and am not sure what point you are saying he proved. This is all ridiculous.
 
I need a cig
 
I feel sorry for you Lev. You are a sad old man. You don't know that I do or don't have RA. I got out of the diagnosis. I don't want a diagnosis like that. Now I can get on with my life. I don't think at any point in this thread that I mentioned doctors were over medicating nor did I speak of anything but what I observe when I work. This could take place in any hospital across the country. I spoke about human behavior. How many hours of your life have you spent at the bedside of a person who is suffering or dying? How many Lev? Don't pretend that you know how a nurse of 20 years feels about the profession. You need to walk a mile in my worn down shoes. I was waiting for you to bring up the...you don't have RA, why are you posting here? Many on here are seronegative and have no damage. Do they really have RA? Or is it some other yet to be discovered diagnosis. I'll stay if I want. I'm sorry my new years resolution only lasted till March. You are spiteful and hateful in many if not most of your responses to people How sad is that. Speaking of shoes... how are the MBT's doing?  Have you gotten used to them yet?  I can't wait until it's nicer out so I can wear my MBT sandals.  They ain't much to look at, but I love how they feel. Jan Lucinda,

We've had a couple of members here that said that they had tried the AP protocol and that it didn't work and that they had even gotten joint damage during the therapy. A couple said that they had posted about the failure of the AP protocol and posted that they had gotten joint damage while trying AP on the roadback website. They said that roadback deleted their stories. Are only success stories allowed at roadback as has been charged? If that's the truth and they are so one sided, how can anyone expect to make a informed decision if only one side is allowed to post? Are there stories of not suceeding posted at the roadback? I could not find any "didn't work" posts.

LEV

Thank you for answering my questions, Pip. It's pure curiosity on my end. I still wonder about AP and whether or not it actually works at preventing damage associated with RA. I was telling my hubby about it this morning. I'm still curious as to whether or not your disease is actually being managed by the naproxen instead of the antibiotics. I don't think you'd be interested in being a guinea pig and going off the naproxen to see if the disease doesn't rear it's ugly head?

I read everything that Lev wrote as well. I don't doubt the pain associated with PA is any less than with RA. Pain is PAIN. I do see his point with the differences between PA and RA though. I googled PA and read the info here: http://arthritis.about.com/od/diseasesandconditions/a/palindromic.htm
Let me know if there is a site with better info. I have to agree with Lev that they are two different monsters.
 
As far as treatment by MDs, I guess I've been lucky enough to have a broad network of docs available for use. I did have one doc who bothered me because she would say, "I've seen worse." Not my doc any more. The RD I have now is absolutely fabulous. She is truly interested in and dedicated to getting me better. At my last appointment, she said she was frustrated because she wanted me to be doing wonderful and was concerned about the aggressiveness of my disease. She discussed additional options with me, understands my weariness with taking new meds and said she was going to do everything possible to help. All this coming from a woman who later that evening delivered a healthy baby girl! I'm serious! This doc is AWESOME!
 
Lev is just calling it as it is. He is bold in some of his statements, but completely honest at the same time. I have to respect that. I value everyone's opinions. However, it's a shame that some discussions lead to personal attacks.
Any information and treatments that folks have found successful should be shared. Questions should be addressed. I don't think anyone should be backhanded for challenging a statement. We're all looking for the same thing here, right?
[QUOTE=Pip!]The above person gets my thanks for is long, rambling post.  He unwittingly proved my point.  I think this is the main problem between the AP and the non-AP people.  Something about this HOPE we have un-nerves some people.  The fact that some people can maintain their disease and get their lives back causes them to be unable to process information correctly because if we're right...and if this works...then what does that say about their choices?  So they blame the people who are succeeding instead of looking inside to find out where all that anger should be directed...possibly at the docs who took all their hope away?
 
Pip
[/QUOTE]
 
what an absolutely obnoxious statement.  AP'ers have hope...that is a load of morally superior bullcrap.   Ap'ers like to make generalizations like this implying that they are somehow more enlightened, smarter and more concerned about their health  than anyone who doesn't.  Get over yourself....
 
 
[QUOTE=CO_Mel]

. I still wonder about AP and whether or not it actually works at preventing damage associated with RA. I was telling my hubby about it this morning. I'm still curious as to whether or not your disease is actually being managed by the naproxen instead of the antibiotics

[/QUOTE]
 
From reading this board and Roadback it seems that many of AP'ers are on someother medication as well.  Gimpy I believe is on MTX, plaquenil and minocin but only minocin gets credit for any improvement.  It seems that minocin may be strong enough to keep someone under control by itself but is not strong enough to get someone under control by itself..which is one of the reasons it is not recommended in advanced RA
[QUOTE=buckeye][QUOTE=Pip!]The above person gets my thanks for is long, rambling post.  He unwittingly proved my point.  I think this is the main problem between the AP and the non-AP people.  Something about this HOPE we have un-nerves some people.  The fact that some people can maintain their disease and get their lives back causes them to be unable to process information correctly because if we're right...and if this works...then what does that say about their choices?  So they blame the people who are succeeding instead of looking inside to find out where all that anger should be directed...possibly at the docs who took all their hope away?
 
Pip
[/QUOTE]
 
what an absolutely obnoxious statement.  AP'ers have hope...that is a load of morally superior bullcrap.   Ap'ers like to make generalizations like this implying that they are somehow more enlightened, smarter and more concerned about their health  than anyone who doesn't.  Get over yourself....
 
 
[/QUOTE]
 
Well said Buckeye!  I think people's responses to having a chronic illness are as varied as the individuals that are ill.  Some are optimistic, some are pessimistic, some are realists and some chose to bury their head in the sand................
 
Whatever path anyone decides to follow is fine with me.  I have no control about how others chose to live their lives. 
 
I'm happy, healthy and feel very blessed to have good doctor's who I respect and listen to.   They worked hard, never gave my any reason not to hope and now, I'm in remission.  It was a long road, but I'm here and I enjoy every day! 
 
 And judging by the mail I get here, that kind of attitude and my story has helped many people.  I happy when people are successful treating their illness and get their life back because I know what it feels like, thanks to my "traditional med"...Rituxan
 
 
 
 

Buckeye - I expect better from you.  I seriously suggest you go back and reread what I wrote and reply accordingly.  Right now, a reaction of that magnitude, shows me I'm right on the money - as well as you belong with Lev and his group.  I must be mistaken.

Nikkilynn - I'm so glad to hear you have hope - I mean, that might explain your success on Rituxan.  Remember that  study that YOU posted that showed Rituxan worked less well than the placebo for seronegative people!  How else would one interpret that - your hope is what helped that med work for you.  GOOD FOR YOU!!!

Mel -
 
I'd be interested in going off Naproxen - I keep trying to.  How long would you like?  My next appointment is in April, I think so I'd need to be back on by then so I could truthfully say I'm still on it - LOL.  He gets his knickers in a twist. 
 
And do me a favor - quid pro quo - ask your doc about AP and report back to AI on what she says.  You'll see some 'negative' thinking then.  ;-)
 
PA is Psoratic Arthritis; sometimes abbreviated as PsA because something else is PA too.  Can't remember what tho.  I was Palindromic RA, then RA, and now I'm back to PRA.  Yes, they feel differently.  Again, not trying to give the naysayers a chance to jump, and not trying to say 'my pain is worse than your pain' - but PRA is MUCH more painful than RA.  Or at least how I experienced it was.  There was a point where I just wanted to die because I could not imagine the rest of my life with that amount of PAIN.  I didn't know how I was going to hold on 6 weeks until my first AP doc appointment.  By this point my RF had risen from 353 on diagnosis to somewhere in the 600's (703 when I started AP) and I was on a walker at night.  From there I went to my wheelchair.  Can you imagine having to borrow this stuff from your parents???  That's not how life was supposed to be. 

So, yes, if you want more info on Palindromic - go to www.palindromic.org.  Please lurk there and you will see how bad we are compared to what happens here on AI.  There is one guy who has only had 4 - 5 good days last year.   They have a forum that gets the most hits - 'what hurts today'.  Then there are all the people that moved on to regular RA and are dealing with loss of mobility etc.  AI/RA looks like a walk in the park to me.  When I was RA, it was a walk in the park compared to PRA.
 
As for Lev, see, I can't possibly consider him honest.  He has been corrected multiple times on points about PRA and keeps spreading misinformation; intentionally.  Some people, (and some who consider themselves Christians), spread that same misinformation and it's hard enough for us to get diagnosed let alone treatment.  Considering Lev ran one PRA peep off this board, and the others have refused to name their disease for fear of his BS, I just can't consider Lev anything other than a hateful, misinformed bigot who, thank GOD got his hell of RA here on earth. 
 
Part of what I've been doing while I've been running around and playing with my daughter is rebuilding my filing cabinet.  When Reader wanted those studies on how Minocin worked to to prevent damage I couldn't find them in the 30+ K of emails I'd saved to my hard drive.  I've transferred everything off to a portable hard drive and opened another email account just for research and for sorting.