Complementary medicine mars QoL for RA patients | Arthritis Information

Share
 

20 April 2009
Clin Rheumatol 2009; 28:547–551

 Use of complementary or alternative medicine (CAM) is associated with a lower quality of life (QoL) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other chronic rheumatic diseases, caution Mexican researchers.

“The present results serve as a warning to healthcare professionals caring for rheumatic disease patients that they need to explore CAM use and use context in their patients,” say José Alvarez-Nemegyei and co-workers, from the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social in Mérida, Yucatán.

The team collated information on QoL, function, and cumulated damage for 445 Mexican rheumatic patients with RA (n=64), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, n=192), fibromyalgia (n=34), or knee osteoarthritis (n=155).

Over half (55.9%) of the patients reported using CAM. These patients used an average of 2.2 types of CAM each, most commonly herbal remedies, non-prescribed vitamins, and food supplements. Other CAM reported included prayer, yoga, homeopathy, and acupuncture.

Analysis showed that patients who used CAM had a longer disease duration than nonusers (96 vs 72 months) and a longer time to rheumatologist referral (31 vs 18 months).

Furthermore, CAM use predicted overall poorer scores in the Short Form (SF)-36 QoL assessment, as well as poorer scores in the physical function, general health, bodily pain, and social functioning domains.

Of note, patients with SLE who used CAM also showed greater cumulated damage than patients who had not used CAM.

Writing in the journal Clinical Rheumatology, the researchers conclude that their research “highlights the need for more research on CAM modalities in chronic rheumatic diseases utilizing strict scientific standards to determine which CAM are potentially damaging, which are efficacious, and how they can be incorporated into therapeutic approaches.”

Free abstract

interesting.... but not surprising..

CAM is not an "only" avenue.. it's an alternate or additional one... I opt for additional.
 
 
[QUOTE=Lynn49]Of note, patients with SLE who used CAM also showed greater cumulated damage than patients who had not used CAM.[/quote]

Hmmm, that is an cause for pause and re-evaluation, say eh?


On the other hand, it could be that the patients who are not getting adequate relief from traditional treatments turn to CAM more frequently.  Same for patients with greater cumulative damage.  These events would skew the CAM population towards more damage and lower QoL, through no fault of the CAM.  This study just shows a correlation - it does not address causation. JasmineRain2009-04-20 09:28:06Patients using CAM in Mexico also don't have adequate medical care or they're suspicous of modern medicine.  It's easier to use CAM and Prednisone.  Pred. seems to be the drug of choice for many illnesses and diseases and is given freely, at least in the rural area where we live.  I would assume this study is skewed because of the intermittent care and the quality of care.  Some areas have wonderful healthcare and other areas it's just about non-existent.  Not all Mexicans have healthcare benefits, in fact a large group do not and that's one of the reasons CAM is so widespread.  There's also a difference in the quality of CAM from one area to another and that would also affect the study.  LindyThank you JasmineRaine and Lindy, those types of reevaluations were exactly what I had in mind.

good points..

completely forgot the discrepancies in the quality.....
 
so.. true.
 
 

Copyright ArthritisInsight.com