26 LIES ABOUT H.R. 3200 | Arthritis Information

Share
 


FROM FACT CHECK.ORG

<>

Twenty-six Lies About H.R. 3200

A notorious analysis of the House health care bill contains 48 claims. Twenty-six of them are false and the rest mostly misleading. Only four are true.

August 28, 2009

Our inbox has been overrun with messages asking us to weigh in on a mammoth list of claims about the House health care bill. The chain e-mail purports to give "a few highlights" from the first half of the bill, but the list of 48 assertions is filled with falsehoods, exaggerations and misinterpretations. We examined each of the e-mail’s claims, finding 26 of them to be false and 18 to be misleading, only partly true or half true. Only four are accurate.

This chain e-mail claims to give a run-down of what’s in the House health care bill, H.R. 3200. Instead, it shows evidence of a reading comprehension problem on the part of the author. Some of our more enterprising readers have even taken it upon themselves to debunk a few of the assertions, sending us their notes and encouraging us to write about it. We applaud your fact-checking skills and your skepticism. And skepticism is warranted.

A few readers alerted us to the fact that a state representative in North Carolina, Rep. Curtis Blackwood, published a version of the e-mail in a newsletter to constituents, telling them that while going through e-mail, he came across "some interesting information on the Democrats’ big health care bill, H.R. 3200. … While this is federal legislation and not state, the topic is of enough significance that I thought many of you would be interested in reading it." We’d refer Rep. Blackwood to our special report on viral messages titled, "That Chain E-mail Your Friend Sent to You Is (Likely) Bogus. Seriously."

We can trace the origins of this collection of claims to a conservative blogger who issued his instant and mostly mistaken analyses as brief "tweets" sent via Twitter as he was paging through the 1,017-page bill. The claims have been embraced as true and posted on hundreds of Web sites, and forwarded in the form of chain e-mails countless times. But there’s hardly any truth in them. We’ll go through each of the claims in this message:

To read complete article see:

http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/twenty-six-lies-about-hr-3200/

Really, Joie, seriously?  You want us to check our facts before we send them out in an email?  Do you really think a bipartisan, fact checking site is a better place to get information than a blog? 
 
Listen I know if my cousin, Charlie, sent me that email, it must be true!   And if the info in it supports my opinion, I'm sending it to everyone I know!
[QUOTE=Hillhoney]Really, Joie, seriously?  You want us to check our facts before we send them out in an email?  Do you really think a bipartisan, fact checking site is a better place to get information than a blog? 
 
Listen I know if my cousin, Charlie, sent me that email, it must be true!   And if the info in it supports my opinion, I'm sending it to everyone I know!
[/QUOTE]
 
I think it's not much to ask:
 
think before you speak.. snopes before your forward.... from your fact checking site with another fact checking site (say that ten times fast  ) you might wanna take a look at  to help you find the truth in American politics. Reporters and editors from the Times fact-check statements by members of Congress, the White House, lobbyists and interest groups and rate them on our Truth-O-Meter. We’re also tracking more than 500 of Barack Obama’s campaign promises and are rating their progress on our new Obameter." Their "truth-o-meter" uses the ratings:  true, mostly true, half true, barely true, false and PANTS ON FIRE! I'm glad to have yet another source to verify information Joie.  Thank you!Thanks Joie.
Copyright ArthritisInsight.com