More RA Info...Because this is an RA forum | Arthritis Information

Share
 

ANTI-TNF THERAPY FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS MAY INCREASE RISK OF JOINT INFECTIONS

PHILADELPHIA – Anti tumor necrosis factor therapy for rheumatoid arthritis appears to increase a patient’s risk of developing septic arthritis, which is the infection of a joint, according to research presented this week at the American College of Rheumatology Annual Scientific Meeting in Philadelphia, Pa.

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic disease that causes pain, stiffness, swelling, and limitation in the motion and function of multiple joints. Though joints are the principal body parts affected by RA, inflammation can develop in other organs as well. An estimated 1.3 million Americans have RA, and the disease typically affects women twice as often as men. Septic arthritis is a serious condition that can be life threatening, and it is more likely to occur in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

TNF-antagonists (anti-TNF therapy; among drugs called biologics) are a class of drugs that have been used since 1998; overall, they have been given to more than 600,000 people worldwide. These drugs are given to lessen inflammation by interfering with biologic substances that cause or worsen inflammation.

Using the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register—a registry that tracks the progress of patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis and other rheumatic conditions who are taking anti-TNF therapy—researchers recently looked at the association between anti-TNF therapy and septic arthritis.

Researchers studied 11,757 people with RA who were undergoing anti-TNF therapy and compared them to 3,515 patients who were undergoing treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. They began recruiting patients in October of 2001 and continued to monitor them until December 31, 2008, the end of their follow up to treatment, or their death. A patient’s health was monitored through questionnaires filled out by the patients and their physicians. A case of septic arthritis was attributable to anti-TNF therapy if it was diagnosed while the patient was on the therapy or within 90 days of his or her last dose.

During the study, 246 cases of septic arthritis were identified. Of these cases, 229 were among patients taking anti-TNF therapy and 17 were among the patients on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (commonly called DMARDs). Staphylococci (commonly called staph) were the most common infection among both groups of patients. Septic arthritis was twice as likely to occur in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were taking anti-TNF therapy than in patients who were not on these drugs. 

"It has previously been shown that patients exposed to TNF-antagonists have an increased risk of serious infections as a whole,” explains James Galloway, MD; clinical research fellow; BSR Biologics Register; ARC unit; University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, and lead investigator in the study. “This study adds to this knowledge confirming that septic arthritis in particular is associated with TNF inhibition."

Dr. Galloway also mentions that, as many patients do not realize that replaced joints are still at risk for infection, it is important to note that the risk of infection is increased in joints that have already been replaced as well as in original joints.

Patients with RA need to be carefully monitored for the development of septic arthritis. Appropriate medical evaluation and treatment, including reducing—and even stopping—immunosuppressive therapy is essential to the management of septic arthritis. Patients should talk to their rheumatologists to determine their best course of treatment.

The ACR is an organization of and for physicians, health professionals, and scientists that advances rheumatology through programs of education, research, advocacy and practice support that foster excellence in the care of people with or at risk for arthritis and rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. For more information on the ACR’s annual meeting, see www.rheumatology.org/annual.

http://www.rheumatology.org/press/2009/2009_am_04.asp
this one makes me nervous...with 7 major joints replaced the last thing I want is a joint infection of any sortBuckeye, thank goodness you are well-informed and well-versed in your disease and that you are proactive in your health care. Additionally, having the long-term relationship that you do with your physicians has to be of benefit.

I send you my very best wishes for continued good health and shiny joints!

As always Lynn, thanks for keeping us informed. Welcome back.
Thank you...I'm glad to be back Lynn492009-10-26 13:02:29Like Buckeye I'm a little stressed about this.  I have one replacement and am looking at 2 more in the future.  All we can do is be aware of any unusual symptoms and get in to see the doctor immediately.  Lindy4 joint replacements -- hips and knees.  Been on a biologic since 2002.  So far no major problems.  Hoping that continues. 

Thanks Lynn.  I'll bring this up at my next checkup on TKRs. 
Thanks Lynn, this is sure worth being aware of, joint replacement or no.  I would like to add my welcome back to you too!

bump [QUOTE=LinB]Like Buckeye I'm a little stressed about this.  I have one replacement and am looking at 2 more in the future.  All we can do is be aware of any unusual symptoms and get in to see the doctor immediately.  Lindy[/QUOTE]
YES! As has recently been discussed elsewhere, at least some of us tend to dismiss or under-value unusual signs and symptoms. This article is cause-enough to never be dismissive of an S/S!

Copyright ArthritisInsight.com