RA increasing in white women | Arthritis Information

Share
 

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - After decades of decline, rheumatoid arthritis is on the rise among white women in the US, new research shows.

While the study wasn't designed to investigate why this is happening, the speed of the change points to environmental, rather than genetic, factors, Dr. Sherine E. Gabriel of the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine in Rochester, Minnesota, one of the study's authors, told Reuters Health. "It's pretty unlikely that the genetic makeup of a population changed that quickly."

In rheumatoid arthritis, or RA, a person's immune system attacks the joints, leading to inflammation, pain, stiffness and in some cases erosion of the bone and joint deformity.

In their study, Gabriel and her team used data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project, which has been tracking medical records from health care providers in Olmstead County, Minnesota since the early 1900s, and has been funded by the National Institutes of Health for more than 40 years. The project includes information on virtually everyone who has sought medical care in the county for the past several decades.

The researchers had previously analyzed data for the period 1955 to 1994, which showed a steady decline in cases of RA for both men and women. In the current analysis, of data from 1995 to 2007, they identified 466 people with a confirmed diagnosis of the disease.

During that time, the researchers found, RA risk held steady for men, with about 28 men diagnosed annually for every 100,000 men in the general population.

But for women, there was a slight increase in incidence of 2.5 percent per year between 1995 and 2007, with an average annual incidence of 53 diagnoses per 100,000 women for the entire time period.

The actual percentage of women with RA in the county rose from about three-quarters of a percent in 1995 to nearly 1 percent in 2005; for men, fewer than half a percent had RA at both time points.

There are many possible environmental factors that could be playing a role in the decline and subsequent increase of RA among women, Gabriel and her team note. For example, while smoking -- one of the few confirmed risk factors for the disease --declined sharply since the 1950s, it hasn't declined as quickly among women as it has among men. "Women were sort of slower to pick up that bad habit, and they seem to be a little slower to drop it," the researcher said.

Other factors could include the changing composition of oral contraceptives. The pill has been shown to protect women against RA. However, because the oral contraceptives of today contain far less estrogen than they used to, they may be less protective, according to Gabriel and her team.

Vitamin D deficiency, which has been linked to RA, is another possibility, the researchers say. Deficiency in this nutrient has been on the rise in recent years, particularly among women.

Because the population of Olmstead County is 90 percent white, the findings likely can't be extrapolated to other ethnic groups. Nevertheless, the researchers say, the pattern observed in the current study is very likely to reflect that in the general US white population.

While the findings are mostly of interest from a scientific perspective, they offer a couple of messages for women, too, according to Gabriel: don't smoke, and get checked for vitamin D deficiency. The findings provide "just one more reason to quit that bad habit," she said.

SOURCE: Arthritis & Rheumatism, online February 26, 2010.

So it's another case of choosing your poison. 
 
Rather than all these studies about RA, I'm beginning to think that there's a lot about Vitamin D that we don't know and ought to.
There is so much more to be learned about women's health.  As research gets more gender specific, who knows what they will figure out?!  So many of the women here have long felt a strong tie to hormones and RA. 

Sam, I don't really understand what you mean by choosing your poison.  I agree with you on the Vitamin D, I just know that has so much more to do with life than we know!  I keep thinking about our early ancestors; how much more exposure they had to the sun, how they ate certain foods during certain times of the year, more greens in the spring and summer, more orange and red veggies and nuts in fall, more meat in winter.  Also,  think about how the foods we eat daily, processed and preserved and fast, were not in their lives at all, (much less daily!) and how much eating habits have changed in the last 30 years.  It seems to me our bodies can't have adapted, if they can at all, to the daily assault of chemicals we now have to process. 

It's probably dangerous for me to think too deeply... especially on a Monday!

Waddie, what I meant by "choose your poison" had to do with the reference in the article itself about reduction in oral contraceptives and increase in RA. You can choose oral contraceptives and have a better chance [from what I infer from the article] of having protection from RA......in which case you up the odds of cancer......so choose between the poisons.
 
Personally, I would rather take the oral contraceptives as the benefits far outweight the risk.
Finally, after all these years, an answer to the question posed by Sheriff Bart in Blazing Saddles: "Hey, where the white women at?"

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071230/quotes
[QUOTE=Sam1234]Waddie, what I meant by "choose your poison" had to do with the reference in the article itself about reduction in oral contraceptives and increase in RA. You can choose oral contraceptives and have a better chance [from what I infer from the article] of having protection from RA......in which case you up the odds of cancer......so choose between the poisons.
Copyright ArthritisInsight.com